Mustangs and Cyclones

Talk about modding or building your own guitar from scratch.
User avatar
AndyMansh
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:46 am

Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by AndyMansh » Mon Dec 06, 2021 5:18 am

Hi there, I was wondering if someone could answer a question for me?

I'm looking at trying to get to a mustang or Duo sonic, but a with Strat style trem.

One of the options I'm considering is using a Squier Cyclone body. I've read that the Cyclone has the same sized body as the Mustang - but they have different scale lengths. Mustang's 24", Cyclone 24.75".

But is this scale difference purely down to differently constructed necks? would a 24" Jag, DS or Mustang neck intonate on a Cyclone body?

As a last resort I may have to get one of the Char Mustangs shipped from Japan, but could do without the expense!

Thanks

User avatar
AcrylicSuperman
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 447
Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 3:37 am

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by AcrylicSuperman » Mon Dec 06, 2021 8:25 am

I could be wrong about this so someone will correct me if that's the case, but I do believe the bridge is in a different location on the cyclone compared to a mustang, so a 24" scale neck may not actually intonate. Having said that, it seems like I heard the cyclones were a conversion scale neck. I may be mistaking that with the Jagmasters. Someone may correct me, but I'm pretty sure they weren't compatible.

User avatar
s_mcsleazy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 18437
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:30 am
Location: glasgow

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by s_mcsleazy » Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:51 am

the body is the same shape but the scale is different.
offset guitars resident bass player.
'Are you trying to seduce me Mrs Robinson? Or do you just want me to solder a couple of resistors into your Muff?'

User avatar
AndyMansh
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:46 am

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by AndyMansh » Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:28 am

s_mcsleazy wrote:
Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:51 am
the body is the same shape but the scale is different.
Yes, but is it different scale because just the neck is different, or is it different because the neck/pocket/bridge are different?

User avatar
supersonicjazzmaster
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 389
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:10 pm
Location: Berlinesia, Germanifornia

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by supersonicjazzmaster » Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:29 pm

I owned a Cyclone years ago. I remember that the body was way thicker than a Mustangs body.
...Uncomfortable to play for me..
This was a red Cyclone with the three Jag Pickups.
It starts... when it begins.
Ralf Kilauea

User avatar
CROSS_guitars
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3131
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:52 am
Location: Thornbury Melbourne

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by CROSS_guitars » Mon Dec 06, 2021 5:54 pm

You can't pop a 24" scale Mustang neck on a Cyclone body or vice versa. The location of the bridge to neck pocket measurement is different.

I think Warmoth make Mustang bodies with a Strat tremolo option.

Also, the body shape of the Cyclone is different on the treble side. The waist is a bit wider. So it's not simply a Mustang body with a strat trem, it's pretty much its own thing.

User avatar
AndyMansh
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:46 am

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by AndyMansh » Tue Dec 07, 2021 1:31 am

CROSS_guitars wrote:
Mon Dec 06, 2021 5:54 pm
You can't pop a 24" scale Mustang neck on a Cyclone body or vice versa. The location of the bridge to neck pocket measurement is different.

I think Warmoth make Mustang bodies with a Strat tremolo option.

Also, the body shape of the Cyclone is different on the treble side. The waist is a bit wider. So it's not simply a Mustang body with a strat trem, it's pretty much its own thing.
Thank you, not want I wanted to hear, but a definitive answer.

User avatar
Futuron
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 3:19 am
Location: Australia

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by Futuron » Tue Dec 07, 2021 2:05 am

Give the Paranormal Cyclone a try as-is!

User avatar
jagstang
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:43 am
Location: south of germany
Contact:

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by jagstang » Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:24 am

I own a mustang and a cyclone. They are totally different guitars. Cyclones body is way more thicker. And this thicker body is needed to fit the strat-tremolo. On a mustang the tremolo block would protrude on the back.

User avatar
AndyMansh
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:46 am

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by AndyMansh » Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:40 am

jagstang wrote:
Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:24 am
I own a mustang and a cyclone. They are totally different guitars. Cyclones body is way more thicker. And this thicker body is needed to fit the strat-tremolo. On a mustang the tremolo block would protrude on the back.
Hi, yes, my idea was to put a mustang neck on a cyclone to bring it down to 24”, but this won’t work, so back to the drawing board

User avatar
AndyMansh
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:46 am

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by AndyMansh » Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:40 am

Futuron wrote:
Tue Dec 07, 2021 2:05 am
Give the Paranormal Cyclone a try as-is!
Yes I might!

User avatar
ThePearDream
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2084
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 6:18 am
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by ThePearDream » Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:16 pm

For a standard 24" scale neck, you are looking for a heel to saddle distance of 6-1/4". I don't have a Cyclone myself, but I do have a Paranormal Toronado, which (I believe) has the same neck. From my measurements, with a 24" neck, the saddles would need to move forward ~1/8" to intonate.

On my Toronado, I can barely get my 0.052" E string saddle back far enough. Fender habitually put their bridges too far forward IMO, so being able to move the saddles forward a bit, will likely work out to your benefit here.

So, I'm 98% confident that a normal Mustang/Jag neck will intonate fine on a Paranormal Cyclone.
Doug
@dpcannafax

User avatar
Fiddy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 12395
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Canada Dry

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by Fiddy » Fri Dec 10, 2021 1:33 am

Doesn't the cyclone come with some sort of conversion neck? I remember trying to fit a 24", more than 10 years ago, and not working for some reason..

User avatar
AndyMansh
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:46 am

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by AndyMansh » Fri Dec 10, 2021 2:31 am

ThePearDream wrote:
Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:16 pm
For a standard 24" scale neck, you are looking for a heel to saddle distance of 6-1/4". I don't have a Cyclone myself, but I do have a Paranormal Toronado, which (I believe) has the same neck. From my measurements, with a 24" neck, the saddles would need to move forward ~1/8" to intonate.

On my Toronado, I can barely get my 0.052" E string saddle back far enough. Fender habitually put their bridges too far forward IMO, so being able to move the saddles forward a bit, will likely work out to your benefit here.

So, I'm 98% confident that a normal Mustang/Jag neck will intonate fine on a Paranormal Cyclone.
This is interesting. May be worth getting a cheap one and trying it

User avatar
ThePearDream
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2084
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 6:18 am
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Re: Mustangs and Cyclones

Post by ThePearDream » Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:41 am

tribi9 wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 1:33 am
Doesn't the cyclone come with some sort of conversion neck? I remember trying to fit a 24", more than 10 years ago, and not working for some reason..
It has a 24.75" neck, but it isn't a conversion neck, or at least not a 25.5>24.75 conversion neck. The older versions may have had a different neck, I don't really know. For this application, the math just happens to work out though.
Doug
@dpcannafax

Post Reply