jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Talk about modding or building your own guitar from scratch.
User avatar
HNB
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 13544
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 7:55 am
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Contact:

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by HNB » Tue May 18, 2021 10:52 am

The trisonic look is really cool on a Jaguar. Especially with the chrome accents. :D
Christopher
Lilith Guitars

User avatar
Remork
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:03 am

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Remork » Tue May 18, 2021 11:48 am

Deed_Poll wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 9:02 am
But just pretend one of those switches isn't there!
aaah. that's so much more relaxed :)
Deed_Poll wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 9:02 am
It's basically a Red Special standing in for the Rhythm Circuit, and with (I believe) a clearer and more mappable functionality and half as many switches.
yes! that's what i was thinking of doing on the diamond plate - three three-way switches, for the whole red special experience with half the switches.
but then i realised that (for similar reasons as the concentrics) i would never be relaxed enough to find the middle position on those switches while on stage, hahaha :fp:
so i'm still chewing on the options.
Deed_Poll wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 9:02 am
The only thing it *won't* do is parallel / out of phase. But I've personally never been a big fan of this sound on single-coil guitars, and even where I am a fan of it (on Peter Green's Les Paul) I can't help but think it would be even better if it was wired in series anyway!
hah, i have a P90 les paul with a flipped magnet for that one 8)
it's a weird mid-70's goldtop deluxe that came with 300K vol / 100K tone pots. I KNOW.
i swapped those for 500/500 last month.. and while it sounds great, and it FINALLY sounds like the P90's i always suspected were lurking in there, i'm having a hard time getting used to it.. played it stock for about 14 years, and it's just not the same guitar anymore. but i know i'll learn to love it, it really opened up.

User avatar
Remork
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:03 am

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Remork » Tue May 18, 2021 11:49 am

HNB wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 10:52 am
The trisonic look is really cool on a Jaguar. Especially with the chrome accents. :D
totally! can't wait to have some more time to really dive in.
banging up against a deadline for now, unfortunately.. more soon, hopefully!

User avatar
Veitchy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1525
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:12 am
Location: Robe, South Australia

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Veitchy » Tue May 18, 2021 4:37 pm

Tangentially related, but I only just found out the Red Special is a 24 inch scale. In between that and the Jag also has a trapeze-like trem/tailpiece configuration, I'm curious to hear just how close this ends up sounding.

User avatar
HarlowTheFish
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:09 pm

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by HarlowTheFish » Tue May 18, 2021 6:11 pm

Veitchy wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 4:37 pm
Tangentially related, but I only just found out the Red Special is a 24 inch scale. In between that and the Jag also has a trapeze-like trem/tailpiece configuration, I'm curious to hear just how close this ends up sounding.
Something to consider if you wanna nail the construction is that the Red Special has basically no break angle, so maybe something like a Mastery or a recessed roller bridge might be a better option than a standard rocking bridge if that's the sound and feel you're going for.

User avatar
Veitchy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1525
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:12 am
Location: Robe, South Australia

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Veitchy » Tue May 18, 2021 6:15 pm

HarlowTheFish wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 6:11 pm
Veitchy wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 4:37 pm
Tangentially related, but I only just found out the Red Special is a 24 inch scale. In between that and the Jag also has a trapeze-like trem/tailpiece configuration, I'm curious to hear just how close this ends up sounding.
Something to consider if you wanna nail the construction is that the Red Special has basically no break angle, so maybe something like a Mastery or a recessed roller bridge might be a better option than a standard rocking bridge if that's the sound and feel you're going for.
So no break angle, short scale, and doesn't May play with 8 or 9 gauge strings? His strings must be super-loosey-goosey.

User avatar
HarlowTheFish
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:09 pm

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by HarlowTheFish » Tue May 18, 2021 6:20 pm

Veitchy wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 6:15 pm
HarlowTheFish wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 6:11 pm
Veitchy wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 4:37 pm
Tangentially related, but I only just found out the Red Special is a 24 inch scale. In between that and the Jag also has a trapeze-like trem/tailpiece configuration, I'm curious to hear just how close this ends up sounding.
Something to consider if you wanna nail the construction is that the Red Special has basically no break angle, so maybe something like a Mastery or a recessed roller bridge might be a better option than a standard rocking bridge if that's the sound and feel you're going for.
So no break angle, short scale, and doesn't May play with 8 or 9 gauge strings? His strings must be super-loosey-goosey.
Yeah pretty much, and the entire ensemble must put out some pretty thin tone. Keep in mind though that he plays with a coin (IIRC stateside the closest thing is a dime) so the interaction between "pick" and string is pretty different -- I tried it for a bit, and it's this really interesting mix of way less grip on the string (because there's no point on a coin) and way more friction (because of the ridged edges). Kinda cool, I still go for it for huskier clean tones or sinthy kinda lines with the tone rolled all the way down because the attack is both thicker and less pronounced, but pretty particular.

User avatar
Veitchy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1525
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:12 am
Location: Robe, South Australia

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Veitchy » Tue May 18, 2021 9:59 pm

HarlowTheFish wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 6:20 pm
Veitchy wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 6:15 pm
HarlowTheFish wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 6:11 pm


Something to consider if you wanna nail the construction is that the Red Special has basically no break angle, so maybe something like a Mastery or a recessed roller bridge might be a better option than a standard rocking bridge if that's the sound and feel you're going for.
So no break angle, short scale, and doesn't May play with 8 or 9 gauge strings? His strings must be super-loosey-goosey.
Yeah pretty much, and the entire ensemble must put out some pretty thin tone. Keep in mind though that he plays with a coin (IIRC stateside the closest thing is a dime) so the interaction between "pick" and string is pretty different -- I tried it for a bit, and it's this really interesting mix of way less grip on the string (because there's no point on a coin) and way more friction (because of the ridged edges). Kinda cool, I still go for it for huskier clean tones or sinthy kinda lines with the tone rolled all the way down because the attack is both thicker and less pronounced, but pretty particular.
I played with an Australian 10c coin for a while after reading about that. The sound was interesting but I found it lacked the flexibility I needed to play quickly, but also lacked the give I wanted for strumming harder. Granted, I was playing primarily rhythm at that point - if I was more lead/runs/single note focused my experience may have been different. I'd give it another crack but who caries change these days.

User avatar
bodhi
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 464
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:47 pm

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by bodhi » Wed May 19, 2021 8:11 am

[ double post ]
Last edited by bodhi on Wed May 19, 2021 11:47 am, edited 2 times in total.
Jazzmaster project (got a body, placeholder neck, some pickups and ideas)
Tokai Telecaster Thinline with Creamery Pickups Filtertron and Tapped Tele
Blake Mills-inspired Strat project w/ Gold Foil and slide pickup

User avatar
bodhi
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 464
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:47 pm

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by bodhi » Wed May 19, 2021 8:11 am

Sorry for the side-track, but
Deed_Poll wrote:
Mon May 17, 2021 10:27 am

Bodhi, there might be a simpler way to do it, but the way things worked out in my schematic, it was looking like a minimum of 7 poles, and I think I used the 8th just for the sake of simplifying some of the grounding. I'm no wiring expert! But unless there's a way to do it on 4 poles, it would mean having to marry two separate switches anyway, so I settled for that.
... I think this might do it? Add volume and tone controls either as master or to each side separately depending on preference. Also didn't do anything about the typical strat tone pots per pickup specifically, so there's another section of the blade switch to play with if you'd use that...

Image

[edit] NB. you probably need to connect the pots ground through the lug of the rhythm/lead switch (like the pickups themselves) to not cause issues, if using separate volume/tone for each side.

More on track, looking a bit closer at the plate from earlier it now feels it's probably two-way switches there? The cutouts don't seem large enough...
Jazzmaster project (got a body, placeholder neck, some pickups and ideas)
Tokai Telecaster Thinline with Creamery Pickups Filtertron and Tapped Tele
Blake Mills-inspired Strat project w/ Gold Foil and slide pickup

User avatar
bodhi
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 464
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:47 pm

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by bodhi » Fri May 21, 2021 12:41 pm

bodhi wrote:
Wed May 19, 2021 8:11 am
... I think this might do it?
Nope, that won't work... minimally you'd need to disconnect the grounds from each other when toggling between sides, and having both switching outputs connected to the output jack at the same time is likely to cause issues as well...
Jazzmaster project (got a body, placeholder neck, some pickups and ideas)
Tokai Telecaster Thinline with Creamery Pickups Filtertron and Tapped Tele
Blake Mills-inspired Strat project w/ Gold Foil and slide pickup

User avatar
Remork
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:03 am

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Remork » Sat Aug 21, 2021 1:42 am

well, seeing how this is a side project and i have too much stuff going on as it is, progress is devastatingly slow.
however - i bit the bullet and stripped the sunburst. sorry.
i did it to be sure my preferred neck would have a 100% fit to the body.
heat gun, scooper, done in about 45 minutes. the bulk of the surfaces went like a breeze. only slight hassle were the thinner parts (the 'side' of the body), might have something to do with the end grain on the edges.
will need some sanding and some trial and error for a new colour. fingers crossed for all trial and no error, hah.

i will probably sell off the surf green one, put in the pickups from the sunburst and consider it an upgrade - they really do sound better.

hoping to come back quicker with more news.

User avatar
Remork
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:03 am

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Remork » Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:22 am

so, over 1 year later... i know.

this is what i settled on, and i'm quite happy with it!

Image

all chrome on a matte black finish. i think it looks sweet.

i tried several switching options, even had two small pushbuttons for phase underneath neck and middle pickup for a while.. those switches died just from looking at them, so not built for the long run.

what i ended up with now is sort of confusing at first, but i'm getting used to it..
i ditched the tone control altogether, and put in a three position rotary switch that manages the phases of bridge and middle pickups against the neck pickup.
so:
_ neck pickup is always the same phase.
_ position 1 of the three way has bridge out of phase with neck, middle in phase.
_ position 2 has bridge in phase with neck, middle out of phase.
_ position 3 has both bridge and middle out of phase with neck.

so if you're not using the neck pu, pos 1 and 2 are basically the same (bridge and middle out of phase with eachother), pos 3 has them in phase.

what this all means is that the only 'red special' setting i don't have, is all three pu's in phase. the sound of that was of very limited difference to neck and middle in phase (so without bridge) to my ears, so i'm quite happily leaving the least interesting option (again, to my ears) off.. and aim for the least intrusive phase switch ever ;)
i mainly use this rotary to 'preset' the wanted effect - and then just turning a pickup on or off can make for some very radical tonal shifts for leads etc.

i realise some of you may feel this is butchering the 3TSB, but i really am quite pleased with it. :P

User avatar
Embenny
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 10363
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 5:07 am

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Embenny » Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:54 am

Gorgeous. I love trisonics in Jaguars. They sound great, too.

Did you end up wiring all the pickups in series like the RS?
The artist formerly known as mbene085.

User avatar
Unicorn Warrior
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Kentucky, USA

Re: jag w/ trisonics - opinions welcome

Post by Unicorn Warrior » Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:55 am

Remork wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:22 am
so, over 1 year later... i know.

this is what i settled on, and i'm quite happy with it!

Image

all chrome on a matte black finish. i think it looks sweet.

i tried several switching options, even had two small pushbuttons for phase underneath neck and middle pickup for a while.. those switches died just from looking at them, so not built for the long run.

what i ended up with now is sort of confusing at first, but i'm getting used to it..
i ditched the tone control altogether, and put in a three position rotary switch that manages the phases of bridge and middle pickups against the neck pickup.
so:
_ neck pickup is always the same phase.
_ position 1 of the three way has bridge out of phase with neck, middle in phase.
_ position 2 has bridge in phase with neck, middle out of phase.
_ position 3 has both bridge and middle out of phase with neck.

so if you're not using the neck pu, pos 1 and 2 are basically the same (bridge and middle out of phase with eachother), pos 3 has them in phase.

what this all means is that the only 'red special' setting i don't have, is all three pu's in phase. the sound of that was of very limited difference to neck and middle in phase (so without bridge) to my ears, so i'm quite happily leaving the least interesting option (again, to my ears) off.. and aim for the least intrusive phase switch ever ;)
i mainly use this rotary to 'preset' the wanted effect - and then just turning a pickup on or off can make for some very radical tonal shifts for leads etc.

i realise some of you may feel this is butchering the 3TSB, but i really am quite pleased with it. :P
What do these sound like?

Post Reply