Audio vs Linear pot for volume
- Harbor_mcfly
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:31 am
Audio vs Linear pot for volume
I ordered a Jazzmaster wiring kit for my partsmaster and everything seemed to be correct with all the wiring diagrams I've seen, except instead of sending me one 1meg linear and one 1 meg audio pot, I was sent two 1meg audio pots. I'm really trying to get as true to a vintage Jazzmaster as I can in terms of tone. Will using an audio pot for volume make any difference in tone, or is it not that big of a deal?
- jim93
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:11 pm
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
If I recall correctly :
The difference between the pots is how the pots changes from 0 to X where X is the pot value.
linear scale
log scale
Human hearing works on a log scale http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel
The difference between the pots is how the pots changes from 0 to X where X is the pot value.
linear scale
log scale
Human hearing works on a log scale http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel
- Soochdaddy
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2389
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 9:47 pm
- Location: SoCal
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
In terms of resistance, 0 - 1,000,000 ohms is still 0 - 1,000,000 ohms whether the scale is linear or log (let's conveniently ignore that fact that a log axis cannot have a zero value)... so, no, it would not affect the tone of the circuit.Harbor_mcfly wrote:I ordered a Jazzmaster wiring kit for my partsmaster and everything seemed to be correct with all the wiring diagrams I've seen, except instead of sending me one 1meg linear and one 1 meg audio pot, I was sent two 1meg audio pots. I'm really trying to get as true to a vintage Jazzmaster as I can in terms of tone. Will using an audio pot for volume make any difference in tone, or is it not that big of a deal?
What it will do differently is control the way the sweep works, which you might find to be a pain in the ass in pursuit of control. An audio pot for your volume control might seem more like an "ON/OFF" switch... If you look at the second plot jim93 posted, you will see that between the origin and 100 on the X axis, the Y axis value increases by almost 5. Now, between 100 and 500 on the X-axis, the Y axis value increases by about 1 (from 5 to 6).
So the volume pot will "feel" like it doesn't do much for a chunk of its range, and then the volume will start to drop off rapidly in the remainder. Depending where you are on the pot sweep, either big adjustments will make minimal difference or small adjustments will make a big difference.
"I want to be able to purchase gin in bulk at Costco on a Sunday. So I totally voted." - chrisrnps
"Always socks on cocks-as to protect my low hanging guitar from getting 'cock rash' when playing in the nude, of course." - basique
"Always socks on cocks-as to protect my low hanging guitar from getting 'cock rash' when playing in the nude, of course." - basique
- Harbor_mcfly
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:31 am
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
Thanks for the response! Knowing that, I probably will look for a taper. Seems like it would be tough to get that slight roll off if you're wanting to clean up the signal with an audio pot.
- cbrown
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 12:53 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
It won't affect the tone at all.
The position of the knobs will be different for a given tone. It's just personal preference.
The position of the knobs will be different for a given tone. It's just personal preference.
- ClipArtSongs
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:21 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
I replaced the audio volume pot on my MIJ Jag with a linear pot.
Hands down the highest value for effort/cost adjustments I've ever made.
Hands down the highest value for effort/cost adjustments I've ever made.
www.clipartsongs.bandcamp.com
- Zeus
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
I'm thinking changing the volume pot in my USA-made 50th Anniversary Jaguar from 1 meg audio to 1 meg linear.
Working on the basis that I'm a complete idiot about these things, what should I be buying?
Would this work without changing the existing knobs? http://www.angela.com/fenderjazzmaster1 ... 53000.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(I've never touched a soldering iron in my life, so I might get someone else to do the tricky work, but I want to have the right parts first.)
Working on the basis that I'm a complete idiot about these things, what should I be buying?
Would this work without changing the existing knobs? http://www.angela.com/fenderjazzmaster1 ... 53000.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(I've never touched a soldering iron in my life, so I might get someone else to do the tricky work, but I want to have the right parts first.)
- StevenO
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 17774
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:06 pm
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
Not exactly sure why anyone would prefer a Linear pot to an Audio pot. Audip pots tend to have a more gradual swell in volume rather than the sharp jump in volume that Linear pots have. I guess it's all preference, but I'd much rather have an Audio pot, as they tend to be more intuitive and versatile.
- StevenO
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 17774
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:06 pm
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
I think you have the two mixed up. The Linear pots act more like an on/off switch due to how our hearing works. We don't hear things linearly, an audio pot works like how our hearing works... What looks like a sharp curve on a graph actually translates to a gradual increase in volume throughout the pots taper.Soochdaddy wrote:In terms of resistance, 0 - 1,000,000 ohms is still 0 - 1,000,000 ohms whether the scale is linear or log (let's conveniently ignore that fact that a log axis cannot have a zero value)... so, no, it would not affect the tone of the circuit.Harbor_mcfly wrote:I ordered a Jazzmaster wiring kit for my partsmaster and everything seemed to be correct with all the wiring diagrams I've seen, except instead of sending me one 1meg linear and one 1 meg audio pot, I was sent two 1meg audio pots. I'm really trying to get as true to a vintage Jazzmaster as I can in terms of tone. Will using an audio pot for volume make any difference in tone, or is it not that big of a deal?
What it will do differently is control the way the sweep works, which you might find to be a pain in the ass in pursuit of control. An audio pot for your volume control might seem more like an "ON/OFF" switch... If you look at the second plot jim93 posted, you will see that between the origin and 100 on the X axis, the Y axis value increases by almost 5. Now, between 100 and 500 on the X-axis, the Y axis value increases by about 1 (from 5 to 6).
So the volume pot will "feel" like it doesn't do much for a chunk of its range, and then the volume will start to drop off rapidly in the remainder. Depending where you are on the pot sweep, either big adjustments will make minimal difference or small adjustments will make a big difference.
- Zeus
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
This is a confusing topic for me, as that's exactly what I experience with the audio taper in the Jag, that sudden on/off, and that's why I want to try linear in the hope that it would be more gradual.StevenO wrote:I think you have the two mixed up. The Linear pots act more like an on/off switch due to how our hearing works. We don't hear things linearly, an audio pot works like how our hearing works... What looks like a sharp curve on a graph actually translates to a gradual increase in volume throughout the pots taper.
- StevenO
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 17774
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:06 pm
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
Linear, in my experience, has never had a gradual swell/taper. Are you positive your pot is an audio/logarithmic pot? Maybe it's how the guitar is wired? Honestly, I'm not sure.
- Zeus
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
This post (on a Strat forum) explains my experience of the taper on the Jag perfectly:
https://www.strat-talk.com/threads/volu ... fix.85430/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.strat-talk.com/threads/volu ... fix.85430/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Maybe different people hear/experience that change differently, but the audio taper has such a dramatic change from 10 to (say) 8.5 that I'm willing to take the chance on linear as it couldn't be any worse in that respect.the fact that a linear pot rolls down slower than an audio taper is not a matter of preference. the voltage on linear taper is 50% at 5 or 50% of travel. on audio taper it is 50% at 9 or 90% of travel. so rolling down 50% of the voltage in a much shorter distance the audio taper rolls down faster. that is not debatable. whether you like that or not is a different story.
- StevenO
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 17774
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:06 pm
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
The way I hear Linear pots is like this... "Gradual change from 10-7, then on/off", where as Audio is like "smooth consistent change from 10-1", "10" being full-on.
It is a matter of preference, for sure. I just know that swells tend to sound better with Audio pots, but I could see a Linear pot working better for having a cleaning-up effect being available with minimal knob turning. To me, that's too finicky, but then again I learned on Tele and Strats, so audio is what I'm accustomed to.
It is a matter of preference, for sure. I just know that swells tend to sound better with Audio pots, but I could see a Linear pot working better for having a cleaning-up effect being available with minimal knob turning. To me, that's too finicky, but then again I learned on Tele and Strats, so audio is what I'm accustomed to.
- novamax
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:55 am
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
The Jag has a different wiring than the JM and many others: The pot is wired as a voltage divider instead of a resistor which increases the effect of the sweep. So with a linear pot, you'd have a double steep control function. But I find the Jag too steep as it is, so I rewired my Jag to a signal resistor volume pot with audio characteristics.
- Zeus
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
Re: Audio vs Linear pot for volume
This (kind of) goes over my head, but I wonder if that might help.novamax wrote:The Jag has a different wiring than the JM and many others: The pot is wired as a voltage divider instead of a resistor which increases the effect of the sweep. So with a linear pot, you'd have a double steep control function. But I find the Jag too steep as it is, so I rewired my Jag to a signal resistor volume pot with audio characteristics.
I did too, that feel is actually what I'm trying to replicate on my Jag. It's particularly noticeable with something like a Fuzz Face; on my Tele, I could roll down the volume knob and get varying shades of fuzziness (as is meant to happen). On the Jag with the stock audio pot, it's pretty much full on or off.StevenO wrote:I learned on Tele and Strats, so audio is what I'm accustomed to.
I've read of people changing the volume pot to 500k, even 250k, and having some success but I really like the sound of the 1 meg pot so I don't want to change that, just want a more pleasing and gradual change in volume when I roll down the knob.