Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

For help with setups and other technical issues.
Post Reply
User avatar
gusgorman
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:34 am
Location: Bristol, UK

Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by gusgorman » Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:19 am

Hello,

I've had the Novak JM-V / JM-Fat combo in my CIJ pretty much since I owned it. I love the JM-V in the neck, but never really bonded with the JM-Fat in the bridge, certainly not on its own anyway. It does sound good with overdrive, but I play my Jazzmaster clean 99% of the time.

I want to stick with a classic JM sound in this guitar, so I'm debating getting hold of a JM-V for the bridge too.

Can anyone describe what the difference is going to be? I know its hard to put these things into words.

Or as I'm in the UK I'm wondering if I should just try a JM bridge pickup from one of the UK winders, such as the creamery,

Thanks!

User avatar
IceBlueBoogaloo
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2020 6:29 am
Location: Orlando

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by IceBlueBoogaloo » Wed Jun 15, 2022 4:36 am

I can’t speak from experience but my understanding of the JM-Fat (and fat bridges in general) is that it’s designed to compensate for the weaker string vibrations near the bridge.

But I managed to nail a much more satisfying tone from the bridge just by adjusting the pickup height until volume levels were balanced between the two pickups. For reference, this is on a stock Vintera JM which is supposed to be pretty faithful. Novak and Creamery should both be good options for getting a classic JM bridge.

User avatar
gusgorman
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:34 am
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by gusgorman » Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:51 am

IceBlueBoogaloo wrote:
Wed Jun 15, 2022 4:36 am
I can’t speak from experience but my understanding of the JM-Fat (and fat bridges in general) is that it’s designed to compensate for the weaker string vibrations near the bridge.

But I managed to nail a much more satisfying tone from the bridge just by adjusting the pickup height until volume levels were balanced between the two pickups. For reference, this is on a stock Vintera JM which is supposed to be pretty faithful. Novak and Creamery should both be good options for getting a classic JM bridge.
Thanks for the reply.

Yep I think I need to give a classic JM bridge p/up a try. I've had the JM-Fat for about 4 or 5 years now so I've given it a good go.

User avatar
ryland
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by ryland » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:36 pm

I had a JM-V/JM-V combo in a Jazzmaster and found that the bridge sound was too shrill. I replaced the bridge with a JM-FAT, which evened out the high end ice pick sound. I find it much more useable than the JM-V.

User avatar
MapachoPunk
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2023 9:38 pm

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by MapachoPunk » Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:57 pm

gusgorman wrote:
Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:19 am
Hello,

I've had the Novak JM-V / JM-Fat combo in my CIJ pretty much since I owned it. I love the JM-V in the neck, but never really bonded with the JM-Fat in the bridge, certainly not on its own anyway. It does sound good with overdrive, but I play my Jazzmaster clean 99% of the time.

I want to stick with a classic JM sound in this guitar, so I'm debating getting hold of a JM-V for the bridge too.

Can anyone describe what the difference is going to be? I know its hard to put these things into words.

Or as I'm in the UK I'm wondering if I should just try a JM bridge pickup from one of the UK winders, such as the creamery,

Thanks!

I'm currently trying to decide on this very thing. What did you decide? How did it go? I also play clean most of the time and want to maintain the classic JM sound, but it seems many favor the JM-Fat in the bridge.

Thanks!

User avatar
redchapterjubilee
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1800
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:01 am
Location: AVLNC

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by redchapterjubilee » Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:00 am

Most smaller pickup makers will allow you to customize your pickups a bit. Like our OSG'er that runs Sunday Pickups, and to a certain extent Lollar, Fralin, Pickup Wizard, and others allow for a little bit of bespoke work. Lollar and Fralin make + 5% and -5% of their standard Jazzmaster style pickups. A -5% neck and a +5% bridge balance well. Sunday and Pickup Wizard will allow you to really customize windings. Both my pairs of black bobbin Pickup Wizards have +10% bridge pickups. They don't hit an amp as hard as a JM-FAT does but have enough windings to attenuate a bit of treble. That has worked better for me than anyone's set of off-the-shelf standard Jazzmaster pickups.

User avatar
gusgorman
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:34 am
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by gusgorman » Sun Oct 20, 2024 7:28 am

MapachoPunk wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:57 pm


I'm currently trying to decide on this very thing. What did you decide? How did it go? I also play clean most of the time and want to maintain the classic JM sound, but it seems many favor the JM-Fat in the bridge.

Thanks!
Sorry I've only just seen this. I never made the change in the end, but still may do at some point as I've got some wiring issues to sort out anyway.

What did you go with?

User avatar
MapachoPunk
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2023 9:38 pm

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by MapachoPunk » Fri Dec 06, 2024 12:18 am

gusgorman wrote:
Sun Oct 20, 2024 7:28 am
MapachoPunk wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:57 pm


I'm currently trying to decide on this very thing. What did you decide? How did it go? I also play clean most of the time and want to maintain the classic JM sound, but it seems many favor the JM-Fat in the bridge.

Thanks!
Sorry I've only just seen this. I never made the change in the end, but still may do at some point as I've got some wiring issues to sort out anyway.

What did you go with?
I ended up putting PV65s in mine, which have worked out well for a lot less money. Still curious about the Novak's tho...

User avatar
NICQ
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 877
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:49 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by NICQ » Fri Dec 06, 2024 9:38 am

gusgorman wrote:
Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:51 am
Yep I think I need to give a classic JM bridge p/up a try. I've had the JM-Fat for about 4 or 5 years now so I've given it a good go.
I have a Jazzmaster with JM-V / JM-V and it sounds too vintage for me - very bright bridge only sound. i would like to have a thicker bridge sound and want to get a JM-FAT ... already had it in my cart yesterday on Curtis' site but haven't pulled the trigger.. if you want to swap PM me :)

User avatar
therizzla
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2618
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Novak JM-V vs JM-Fat

Post by therizzla » Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:01 am

I had the JM-V/JM-V, JM-V/JM-90 and later JM-V/JM-FAT set ups in my old AVRI and while I liked the JM-V in the neck just fine I didn't like any of the bridge pickups; the V and FAT sounded too shrill and the 90 sounded great with OD through fuzz but too compressed for cleans for me. Currently in my Vintera I I have Lollars and like them quite a bit, they're a bit brighter than I like but they're not shrill like the Novaks.
reverb.

Post Reply