Re: Post pics of your guitar family
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:36 pm
I'd say super-duper hot!j-op wrote: Shortscale, that sunburst Jag is super hot.
Talk about the Fender Jazzmaster, Jaguar, and any other offset waist guitars with us!
https://offsetguitars.com/forums/
I'd say super-duper hot!j-op wrote: Shortscale, that sunburst Jag is super hot.
+1 That Tele's awesome!! BONARIFFICmikkiki wrote:mmmh, sounds like it's gonna be even nicer.BrendanP wrote:Thanks. Yeah, it's a one-piece alder body. It's dismantled right now and soonl get binding on the body and neck.mikkiki wrote: that looks cool! you made that yourself?
and yeah, make a thread about it when you're done!
Isn't the back all black?shortscale wrote:Hahah thanks for the translation, I have just started to try and learn dutch, its hard! But I did understand "snel"williamsanders127 wrote:Vertel er me meer over! SNEL!shortscale wrote: Dank u wel!
(tell me more about it! QUICK!)
The jag is a 1969 original as far as I can tell, its a faux burst witch is why it looks a bit weird. I bought it from your old pal Aen last year. I love it!
yes! I think when the paint started to come off, the guy who owned it must of painted it black on the back to try and hide it ...bizarre.StevenO wrote:Isn't the back all black?shortscale wrote:Hahah thanks for the translation, I have just started to try and learn dutch, its hard! But I did understand "snel"williamsanders127 wrote: Vertel er me meer over! SNEL!
(tell me more about it! QUICK!)
The jag is a 1969 original as far as I can tell, its a faux burst witch is why it looks a bit weird. I bought it from your old pal Aen last year. I love it!
I thought so. It makes it seem suspicious though. Would it still be considered all original with a painted back? I've also never seen a sunburst chip away like that! It looks great though.shortscale wrote:yes! I think when the paint started to come off, the guy who owned it must of painted it black on the back to try and hide it ...bizarre.StevenO wrote:Isn't the back all black?shortscale wrote: Hahah thanks for the translation, I have just started to try and learn dutch, its hard! But I did understand "snel"
The jag is a 1969 original as far as I can tell, its a faux burst witch is why it looks a bit weird. I bought it from your old pal Aen last year. I love it!
i love the jag on the right what year is it?nonemoreblack wrote: Everytime I feel like thinning out my collection I see a thread like this that makes me want to buy more guitars. Oh well, here's mine anyway.
It's a mix of parts mostly 62-65 with reissue electronics, refin as well.light years wrote:i love the jag on the right what year is it?nonemoreblack wrote: Everytime I feel like thinning out my collection I see a thread like this that makes me want to buy more guitars. Oh well, here's mine anyway.
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa13 ... G_0486.jpg
shit, sorry i ment the jag in the middlenonemoreblack wrote:It's a mix of parts mostly 62-65 with reissue electronics, refin as well.light years wrote:i love the jag on the right what year is it?nonemoreblack wrote: Everytime I feel like thinning out my collection I see a thread like this that makes me want to buy more guitars. Oh well, here's mine anyway.
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa13 ... G_0486.jpg
I'm not selling it so I wouldn't worry about itStevenO wrote:I thought so. It makes it seem suspicious though. Would it still be considered all original with a painted back? I've also never seen a sunburst chip away like that! It looks great though.shortscale wrote:yes! I think when the paint started to come off, the guy who owned it must of painted it black on the back to try and hide it ...bizarre.StevenO wrote: Isn't the back all black?