Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Discussion of vintage Jazzmasters, Jaguars, Bass VIs, Electric XIIs and any other offset-waist instruments.
User avatar
Maggieo
Expat
Expat
Posts: 13446
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:36 am
Location: Nebraska, USA
Contact:

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by Maggieo » Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:56 pm

:-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* Lester Young :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-*
“Now I am quietly waiting for/ the catastrophe of my personality/ to seem beautiful again.”- Frank O'Hara
I am not an attorney and this post is for entertainment purposes only. Please consult a licensed attorney in your state for legal advice.

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8804
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by JSett » Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:30 pm

Rob wrote:
Fri Mar 31, 2023 1:39 pm
Some definitions (like "offset," perhaps) are dynamic and have some wiggle room about what is or isn't.
Here in OSG-land we don't subscribe to the idea that the term "offset" is fluid/dynamic :D We have a time-tested measurable guide

Image

RIP Ferbis :-*
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
Rob
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:31 am
Location: Lexington, KY, US

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by Rob » Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:37 pm

JSett wrote:
Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:30 pm
Here in OSG-land we don't subscribe to the idea that the term "offset" is fluid/dynamic
Nor I, but I'm constantly surprised at what people try to argue is or isn't offset.

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8804
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by JSett » Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:43 pm

Rob wrote:
Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:37 pm
JSett wrote:
Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:30 pm
Here in OSG-land we don't subscribe to the idea that the term "offset" is fluid/dynamic
Nor I, but I'm constantly surprised at what people try to argue is or isn't offset.
I am amazed, but not surprised. People can be pretty dismissive of facts these days :D I've given up and don't frequent anywhere but here really anymore...this place is a nice little microcosm of mostly sensible people.
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
sal paradise
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3597
Joined: Thu May 27, 2021 12:41 am

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by sal paradise » Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:55 pm

Image
I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion?

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8804
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by JSett » Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:06 pm

sal paradise wrote:
Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:55 pm
Image
Ferbis would have appreciated a trigger warning there mate
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
Maggieo
Expat
Expat
Posts: 13446
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:36 am
Location: Nebraska, USA
Contact:

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by Maggieo » Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:36 am

Don't forget Bob, the offset cat!

Image
“Now I am quietly waiting for/ the catastrophe of my personality/ to seem beautiful again.”- Frank O'Hara
I am not an attorney and this post is for entertainment purposes only. Please consult a licensed attorney in your state for legal advice.

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8804
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by JSett » Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:42 am

Maggieo wrote:
Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:36 am
Don't forget Bob, the offset cat!

Image
*angle check on aisle 9 please, angle check please*
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
46346
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2826
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:39 am
Location: echo ECHO park PARK
Contact:

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by 46346 » Wed Apr 05, 2023 2:39 am

Larry Mal wrote:
Mon Mar 27, 2023 8:33 am

Plain and simple, it's been the fact that Boomers were willing to pay more for Strats than Jazzmaster, because they saw their guitar heroes playing Strats and not Jazzmasters. And since they were willing to pay more, those guitars are considered to have that value still.
this makes sense, but upon reflection... what happened in my case?

technically i'm a Boomer (1963), though my millennial wife says i'm culturally Gen X...

call me odd, but i have never quested for the guitars of my heroes. heroes like:

Robert Fripp (Gibson Les Paul)
Adrian Belew (Strat, Parker Fly)
Steve Hackett (Gibson Les Paul, 12 string acoustic)
Frank Zappa (Gibson SG among others)
David Gilmour (Strat, Fender Steel)
Frank Black (Fender Telecaster)

... i have owned more guitars than i can count over the decades, many of them vintage 50's, 60's 70's
but i've never lusted for their guitars in particular. the only models from the above that i've owned are a 50's Fender double neck steel (wonderful swap meet bargain that i use often, it may be similar to Gilmour's, i don't know exactly...), and a '74 Tele Custom (that is very different from Frank Black's vintage single coil Teles). oh - and my SG is a Burny Japanese knockoff. i do think of Zappa when wobbling that neck joint sometimes.

but my fascination with the offsets was more of a path of self-discovery. sure, it was Nels Cline who first put a vintage Jazzmaster in my hands, when i asked him about it after seeing him play here in L.A. a few times in the 90's. but he was not quite *yet* becoming a contemporary hero, he was a fellow sonic explorer with a few years on me and a real natural aptitude. he helped me realize it was the actual fit and comfort of the guitar once it was strapped on, that got me into it. that little extra reach for the left arm. i wasn't sure, though, as the extra switching and electronics seemed weird.

but i already had a part-time career playing a 1974 Jazz Bass, which i had chosen among all available options in the second-hand (soon to be vintage) shops in Hollywood, for a mere $600. i didn't even know there had been a 'Jazz Guitar' version from Fender as well. AND, it was that weirdness of an actual 50's/60's Fullerton Fender that could be so misunderstood that also helped win me over, when it was time for me to play electric guitar.

i don't think any of Nels' heroes had played a JM or Jag either, he got that '59 Jazz from his local mate Mike Watt who went bass full-time.

anyway, i don't think i'll ever have the vintage Les Pauls, Strats, and Teles of my Boomer-era heroes, even though if i sold all my other gear, i could pay them down.
people hear the influence of my heroes when i play my JM's, Jags, Starcaster, Dohenys, Japanese SG, Firebird, and Tele, Yamaha SG-3, etc...
we have ways of making them talk! ;)
Cat Museum, ACME, Malcolm Mooney, Dream Apes, The Cooling Time, Kind Hearts and Coronets, Quarks

User avatar
Twang Deluxe
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2021 5:59 am

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by Twang Deluxe » Mon Jun 12, 2023 4:39 am

For me the vintage Fender era ended in 1981/1982 when Fender stopped producing in Fullerton

User avatar
panoramic
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 16926
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:09 pm
Location: baltimore, md.

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by panoramic » Mon Jun 12, 2023 10:19 am

Maggieo wrote:
Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:36 am
Don't forget Bob, the offset cat!

Image
Is he pre-1980?
I used to be cool, now I just complain about prices.

User avatar
Maggieo
Expat
Expat
Posts: 13446
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:36 am
Location: Nebraska, USA
Contact:

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by Maggieo » Mon Jun 12, 2023 10:56 am

panoramic wrote:
Mon Jun 12, 2023 10:19 am
Maggieo wrote:
Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:36 am
Don't forget Bob, the offset cat!

Image
Is he pre-1980?
Nah, he was born in 1997.

But he knows...things...

Image
Bob, March, 2010 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr
“Now I am quietly waiting for/ the catastrophe of my personality/ to seem beautiful again.”- Frank O'Hara
I am not an attorney and this post is for entertainment purposes only. Please consult a licensed attorney in your state for legal advice.

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8804
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by JSett » Mon Jun 12, 2023 11:00 am

Blimey, Bob's a good age!
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
Maggieo
Expat
Expat
Posts: 13446
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:36 am
Location: Nebraska, USA
Contact:

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by Maggieo » Mon Jun 12, 2023 11:09 am

JSett wrote:
Mon Jun 12, 2023 11:00 am
Blimey, Bob's a good age!
He died in 2010 of CRF. Too damn soon.
“Now I am quietly waiting for/ the catastrophe of my personality/ to seem beautiful again.”- Frank O'Hara
I am not an attorney and this post is for entertainment purposes only. Please consult a licensed attorney in your state for legal advice.

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8804
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: Is "vintage = pre-1980" still a useful frame?

Post by JSett » Mon Jun 12, 2023 11:13 am

Maggieo wrote:
Mon Jun 12, 2023 11:09 am
JSett wrote:
Mon Jun 12, 2023 11:00 am
Blimey, Bob's a good age!
He died in 2010 of CRF. Too damn soon.
Oh shit. I'm sorry.

I'm terrified of any of mine leaving us...we've lost a couple over the years and they still pain me oh so much. They're all getting on a bit now too, none are under 10 years old. If only they could live forever
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

Post Reply