Finally streaming on Netflix in the U.K. I had high hopes, given the lack of decent budget documentaries on the folk-rock scene, then I read the reviews. Bloated, self-congratulatory nonsense aside, I actually enjoyed it.
It misses reality, but isn’t that LA’s trick in general?
Echo in the Canyon
- sal paradise
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3637
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2021 12:41 am
Echo in the Canyon
I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion?
- Jonesie
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:00 am
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: Echo in the Canyon
I watched it a few years ago and remember it being pretty good. If you like that you might like the new Tom Petty Wildflowers doc on youtube.
- Veitchy
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Robe, South Australia
Re: Echo in the Canyon
I agree. It would take something closer to Ken Burns to completely document the Laurel Canyon scene but even focusing on the specifics it did, I thought Echo was a little light on. In hindsight I can see how it could come across as self-congratulatory, but I feel like the tone of a lot of scholarship on that era has been pretty much that for decades (bit of a shift in the last decade or so) so I suppose the tone felt reasonably familiar.
The one criticism I had at the time (I watched it a couple of months ago, also on Netflix) was that I felt it couldn't decide what sort of documentary it wanted to be. It seems like they shot a ton of interviews, which would have been nice to see more of. I can give or take the concert footage - perhaps I'd be more into it if it wasn't so broken up. The conversations in the canyon house with the contemporary(ish) musicians seemed like a nice framing device at first, but it became clear pretty quickly that this was rather scripted and I'd be far more interested in these artists' actual opinions on the music.
A lot of this is going to sound like I was pretty down on the doc. This isn't exactly true, I enjoyed it enough and came away knowing more about the scene than I did before. I just felt it was pretty imperfect and I can kinda see why It disappeared off the map after a reasonable amount of hype leading up to it.
I did get a warm fuzzy seeing Neil show up right at the end though.
The one criticism I had at the time (I watched it a couple of months ago, also on Netflix) was that I felt it couldn't decide what sort of documentary it wanted to be. It seems like they shot a ton of interviews, which would have been nice to see more of. I can give or take the concert footage - perhaps I'd be more into it if it wasn't so broken up. The conversations in the canyon house with the contemporary(ish) musicians seemed like a nice framing device at first, but it became clear pretty quickly that this was rather scripted and I'd be far more interested in these artists' actual opinions on the music.
A lot of this is going to sound like I was pretty down on the doc. This isn't exactly true, I enjoyed it enough and came away knowing more about the scene than I did before. I just felt it was pretty imperfect and I can kinda see why It disappeared off the map after a reasonable amount of hype leading up to it.
I did get a warm fuzzy seeing Neil show up right at the end though.
- sal paradise
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3637
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2021 12:41 am
Re: Echo in the Canyon
Yes, I watched that last week LOVE wildflowers
I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion?
- sal paradise
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3637
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2021 12:41 am
Re: Echo in the Canyon
I’d recommend reading Turn! Turn! Turn! by Richie Unterberger if you want a deeper look. Hotel California by Barney Hoskins is a far better book, although it’s more focused on the excesses of the 70s and is far more damning. Anything Hoskins writes is perfect.Veitchy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 1:44 pmI agree. It would take something closer to Ken Burns to completely document the Laurel Canyon scene but even focusing on the specifics it did, I thought Echo was a little light on. In hindsight I can see how it could come across as self-congratulatory, but I feel like the tone of a lot of scholarship on that era has been pretty much that for decades (bit of a shift in the last decade or so) so I suppose the tone felt reasonably familiar.
The one criticism I had at the time (I watched it a couple of months ago, also on Netflix) was that I felt it couldn't decide what sort of documentary it wanted to be. It seems like they shot a ton of interviews, which would have been nice to see more of. I can give or take the concert footage - perhaps I'd be more into it if it wasn't so broken up. The conversations in the canyon house with the contemporary(ish) musicians seemed like a nice framing device at first, but it became clear pretty quickly that this was rather scripted and I'd be far more interested in these artists' actual opinions on the music.
A lot of this is going to sound like I was pretty down on the doc. This isn't exactly true, I enjoyed it enough and came away knowing more about the scene than I did before. I just felt it was pretty imperfect and I can kinda see why It disappeared off the map after a reasonable amount of hype leading up to it.
I did get a warm fuzzy seeing Neil show up right at the end though.
I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion?
- Veitchy
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Robe, South Australia
Re: Echo in the Canyon
Cheers for the recommendation. I tend to burn through books in the (southern hemisphere) summer so they may well get a look in.