Compton Bridges
- thirtydirtybirds
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:35 pm
Compton Bridges
Anyone use one on a jazzmaster? Looking to upgrade the bridge on my JMJM and these seem like they might be great.
- antisymmetric
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3605
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:32 pm
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Compton Bridges
Watching the corners turn corners
- Debaser
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:12 pm
- Location: Phoenix AZ
Re: Compton Bridges
I'm a bar bridge user and swear by them for vibrato use. They help eliminate rattle and also increase sustain (not that I care about sustain). I've owned a Compton, stainless steel with the tone chamber. I also own/owned several Tru-Arcs, which I now use most of the time for a floating bridge, namely rocking, compensated-G Serpentune models in brass, bronze, aluminum and steel.
I don't like either of those bridge makes for hard stud mounted posts. A big factor of decent intonation depends on the factory stud installation. Most probably assume an adjustable saddle bridge will be used. For that reason, I like dBridge. Those bridges are made custom, after you send photos and measurements of your already well set-up TOM. Dave then mills the bridge to those precise measurements, so you'll get the accurate intonation of your particular guitar and string combo. If you don't tweak stuff like string gauges or playing action, it's the best bar bridge solution for a stud-mounted bridge. Well, if you tweak stuff, you're probably not a bar bridge fan in general I have a dBridge in brass, soon to get another for my Starfire V in aluminum. No steel option, but Ebano sounds really good.
I'm not affiliated with any of these folks, but I have used all the bridges mentioned, including the MIJ stock Gretsch bar bridge, and vintage types. In other words, happy consumer...check em out.
https://www.db-guitars.com/
http://www.truarcbridgeworks.com/
I don't like either of those bridge makes for hard stud mounted posts. A big factor of decent intonation depends on the factory stud installation. Most probably assume an adjustable saddle bridge will be used. For that reason, I like dBridge. Those bridges are made custom, after you send photos and measurements of your already well set-up TOM. Dave then mills the bridge to those precise measurements, so you'll get the accurate intonation of your particular guitar and string combo. If you don't tweak stuff like string gauges or playing action, it's the best bar bridge solution for a stud-mounted bridge. Well, if you tweak stuff, you're probably not a bar bridge fan in general I have a dBridge in brass, soon to get another for my Starfire V in aluminum. No steel option, but Ebano sounds really good.
I'm not affiliated with any of these folks, but I have used all the bridges mentioned, including the MIJ stock Gretsch bar bridge, and vintage types. In other words, happy consumer...check em out.
https://www.db-guitars.com/
http://www.truarcbridgeworks.com/
50,000 watts out of Mexico, this is the BorderRadio...
- timtam
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2739
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:42 am
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Compton Bridges
We often make that distinction between sustain performance and 'everything else'. But when you think about it, it doesn't really stand up to scrutiny. Particularly when you look at string frequency content measurements over time (see for example Zollner ch7 ref below). If a string vibration frequency dies out relatively early when left to ring/sustain, that frequency has actually begun to disappear from the strings from just after the pick attack. So that bridge/guitar's frequency palette will be different at all points in time from that of a guitar with better sustain. So it's not like a long-sustaining and short-sustaining guitar will have similar frequency content over the time course of most typical playing, but just when a note is left to sustain for seconds that one guitar's string vibrations 'drop off a cliff' while the other's keep ringing.
So you don't have to want to sound like Carlos Santana to want a guitar with good sustain. A guitar with good sustain will have more retained string vibration content at all points in time.
Of course one reason people like offsets is that the frequency spectrum is characteristically more limited at all points in time. And that's for similar reasons that their sustain is limited.
So while solid 'bar' bridges will indeed increase sustain, they will also retain more string vibration frequency content from the beginning of each note. Bridges with many parts (eg TOMs, offset bridges) have multiple interfaces/air gaps at which vibration can occur, and thus string vibrations are transferred to the bridge and absorbed/lost at those points.
https://www.gitec-forum-eng.de/2019/08/ ... s-on-line/
I don't think we've seen a rocking solid bridge have we ? Maybe it would be good to see one (assuming you can live with fixed intonation ... the trade-off for no moving parts). Although they would require high friction 'saddle' points for the strings to grip so that they can rock the bridge, and bridge height setting would still require screws (but perhaps with a locking screw mechanism to prevent vibration). But with their typical smooth low friction string contact points, bar bridges are perhaps most suited to replacing non-rocking TOM/AOM bridges on offsets with trems.
"I just knew I wanted to make a sound that was the complete opposite of a Les Paul, and that’s pretty much a Jaguar." Rowland S. Howard.
- Larry Mal
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 19724
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:25 pm
- Location: Saint Louis, MO
Re: Compton Bridges
I love TimTam now.
Back in those days, everyone knew that if you were talking about Destiny's Child, you were talking about Beyonce, LaTavia, LeToya, and Larry.
- The Dead Ranch Hands
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:33 am
Re: Compton Bridges
Bigsby Sorkin bridges rock.timtam wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 6:38 pm
I don't think we've seen a rocking solid bridge have we ? Maybe it would be good to see one (assuming you can live with fixed intonation ... the trade-off for no moving parts). Although they would require high friction 'saddle' points for the strings to grip so that they can rock the bridge, and bridge height setting would still require screws (but perhaps with a locking screw mechanism to prevent vibration). But with their typical smooth low friction string contact points, bar bridges are perhaps most suited to replacing non-rocking TOM/AOM bridges on offsets with trems.
- Debaser
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:12 pm
- Location: Phoenix AZ
Re: Compton Bridges
Heh, yes I know what you mean about the sustain and frequency palette, but I’m trying to side step that issue. Trying to coerce a hollowbody to behave like solid body is denying the creative aspects of seeking out the hollowbody in the first place. Thumpy bass notes, quick decay, sometimes dull attack..all the charm. Folks call that “niche” and anti-versatile, and I’m like “what?” But that’s kind of what a bar bridge will move the hollowbody away from, but not overcome. The next step in that ‘solid’ direction would be bracing type, in particular some heavy trestle bracing to further remove the acoustic aspect of the hollowbody. It’s no surprise to me JMs were designed to be a little extra plinky on purposetimtam wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 6:38 pmWe often make that distinction between sustain performance and 'everything else'. But when you think about it, it doesn't really stand up to scrutiny. Particularly when you look at string frequency content measurements over time (see for example Zollner ch7 ref below). If a string vibration frequency dies out relatively early when left to ring/sustain, that frequency has actually begun to disappear from the strings from just after the pick attack. So that bridge/guitar's frequency palette will be different at all points in time from that of a guitar with better sustain. So it's not like a long-sustaining and short-sustaining guitar will have similar frequency content over the time course of most typical playing, but just when a note is left to sustain for seconds that one guitar's string vibrations 'drop off a cliff' while the other's keep ringing.
So you don't have to want to sound like Carlos Santana to want a guitar with good sustain. A guitar with good sustain will have more retained string vibration content at all points in time.
Of course one reason people like offsets is that the frequency spectrum is characteristically more limited at all points in time. And that's for similar reasons that their sustain is limited.
So while solid 'bar' bridges will indeed increase sustain, they will also retain more string vibration frequency content from the beginning of each note. Bridges with many parts (eg TOMs, offset bridges) have multiple interfaces/air gaps at which vibration can occur, and thus string vibrations are transferred to the bridge and absorbed/lost at those points.
https://www.gitec-forum-eng.de/2019/08/ ... s-on-line/
I don't think we've seen a rocking solid bridge have we ? Maybe it would be good to see one (assuming you can live with fixed intonation ... the trade-off for no moving parts). Although they would require high friction 'saddle' points for the strings to grip so that they can rock the bridge, and bridge height setting would still require screws (but perhaps with a locking screw mechanism to prevent vibration). But with their typical smooth low friction string contact points, bar bridges are perhaps most suited to replacing non-rocking TOM/AOM bridges on offsets with trems.
As for a Gretsch Rocking Bar Bridge, that’s the basis for Tim’s bridge, and he makes both an interpretation of the RBB stock or a milled-flat bridge at request. Do they actually rock? Nah course not, but do floating JM/Jag bridges actually return to Top Dead Center? All depends on playing context and expectations. Experience has shown me that friction vs sliding bridge arguments are not so dichotomous. It’s more a combination of the two. The most easy to move part will give first, and in most cases it’s the lazy saddle intonation spring, or the play in bridge post spec that moves before anything else. At some point during vibrato use, one string is sliding while the other is ‘locked’ down to saddle groove with friction, there is no perfect version of one or the other. More of an ‘encouragement’ for one or the other. While the T-A doesn’t pivot as easy as a JM thimble/pointed post will, the chamfer in the post hole of the bridge allows for a certain amount of play. The Bigsby itself has a bit of limitation, one that I’ve only exceeded by using a Mastery 4.1, and those two saddles are definitely moving back and forth during vibe use. The need for locking everything down only leads to locking trems—the Floyd grew out of function, requirements of how one plays and the expectation of returning to perfect pitch.
50,000 watts out of Mexico, this is the BorderRadio...
- timtam
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2739
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:42 am
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Compton Bridges
Hmmm ... interesting. Found your thread ...The Dead Ranch Hands wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:44 pmBigsby Sorkin bridges rock.timtam wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 6:38 pm
I don't think we've seen a rocking solid bridge have we ? Maybe it would be good to see one (assuming you can live with fixed intonation ... the trade-off for no moving parts). Although they would require high friction 'saddle' points for the strings to grip so that they can rock the bridge, and bridge height setting would still require screws (but perhaps with a locking screw mechanism to prevent vibration). But with their typical smooth low friction string contact points, bar bridges are perhaps most suited to replacing non-rocking TOM/AOM bridges on offsets with trems.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=112954
"I just knew I wanted to make a sound that was the complete opposite of a Les Paul, and that’s pretty much a Jaguar." Rowland S. Howard.
- Debaser
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:12 pm
- Location: Phoenix AZ
Re: Compton Bridges
I shaved all my Bigsby bridges down flat, never did return to where they supposed to beThe Dead Ranch Hands wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:44 pmBigsby Sorkin bridges rock.timtam wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 6:38 pm
I don't think we've seen a rocking solid bridge have we ? Maybe it would be good to see one (assuming you can live with fixed intonation ... the trade-off for no moving parts). Although they would require high friction 'saddle' points for the strings to grip so that they can rock the bridge, and bridge height setting would still require screws (but perhaps with a locking screw mechanism to prevent vibration). But with their typical smooth low friction string contact points, bar bridges are perhaps most suited to replacing non-rocking TOM/AOM bridges on offsets with trems.
50,000 watts out of Mexico, this is the BorderRadio...
- antisymmetric
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3605
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:32 pm
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Compton Bridges
I've whipped up my own for my old Jansen Jazzman using the original thimbles and posts. (Not too pretty, just "proof of concept"). Setscrews in the sides to lock to the posts. My best analogy for the sound difference over the original bridge would be that this one's like a more sensitive microphone- you can just brush your fingers over the strings and it'll pick up everything. Intonation seems ok, I shaped this bridge to match the saddle positions on the original bridge. The old bridge isn't going back on, and when I finally get my JM built, one-piece is the way I'll be going.timtam wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 6:38 pm
I don't think we've seen a rocking solid bridge have we ? Maybe it would be good to see one (assuming you can live with fixed intonation ... the trade-off for no moving parts). Although they would require high friction 'saddle' points for the strings to grip so that they can rock the bridge, and bridge height setting would still require screws (but perhaps with a locking screw mechanism to prevent vibration). But with their typical smooth low friction string contact points, bar bridges are perhaps most suited to replacing non-rocking TOM/AOM bridges on offsets with trems.
Watching the corners turn corners
- wproffitt
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:48 pm
- Location: Ellicott City, MD, USA
Re: Compton Bridges
I’m loving this discussion! I thought I was the only one into this concept. I’m not saying my JMs with Comptons dripped right into TOM/AOM posts are perfect, but I love the way they sound and the way the bridge feels under the edge of my palm. I’d be curious to see what it would be like if I had the option of having the posts rock in the thimbles, but haven’t tried to make that happen yet.
- The Dead Ranch Hands
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:33 am
- The Dead Ranch Hands
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:33 am
Re: Compton Bridges
Yeah. I went back to the Mustang bridge for a while, and got frustrated again with the action and have the Sorkin bridge on it again now. It's the best solution for me. I always liked the simplicity and sound of one-piece bridges. I think they fit well with what offsets are kind of supposed to be, which is the solid body answer to a jazz archtop, or a Gretsch, or something along those lines.timtam wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:56 pm
Hmmm ... interesting. Found your thread ...
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=112954
I'm thinking of getting some wooden dowels to put inside the thimbles, with a hole drilled in there for the posts I'm using, just so it feels like it's in there more solidly (currently the posts are wrapped in tape).
- PorkyPrimeCut
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 24469
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:46 am
- Location: Leipzig
- Contact:
Re: Compton Bridges
^ Probably the simplest & by far the best looking solution. ^
You think you can't, you wish you could, I know you can, I wish you would. Slip inside this house as you pass by.
- mgeek
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:03 pm
Re: Compton Bridges
Did an early morning double take as this looks like the one I knocked up in my garage for my Hofner verithin!antisymmetric wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:39 pm
I've whipped up my own for my old Jansen Jazzman using the original thimbles and posts. (Not too pretty, just "proof of concept"). Setscrews in the sides to lock to the posts. My best analogy for the sound difference over the original bridge would be that this one's like a more sensitive microphone- you can just brush your fingers over the strings and it'll pick up everything. Intonation seems ok, I shaped this bridge to match the saddle positions on the original bridge. The old bridge isn't going back on, and when I finally get my JM built, one-piece is the way I'll be going.
Do you think the extra mass compared to a regular Bigsby rocker makes any difference?