Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Talk about modding or building your own guitar from scratch.
Post Reply
User avatar
Fiddy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 12395
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Canada Dry

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by Fiddy » Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:08 pm

Nooooo, no contours. :derp:

User avatar
neutralomen
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by neutralomen » Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:10 pm

tribi9 wrote:Nooooo, no contours.
Hehe. Once I finish the template, I'll have a bunch made and open a shop to sell to you guys. This way you can individually decide if you want contours or not, if you're building one.

User avatar
s_mcsleazy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 18438
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:30 am
Location: glasgow

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by s_mcsleazy » Wed Jun 21, 2017 7:45 pm

i'd rock one..... granted i'd most likely put a jazzy trem on it but i would still rock it
offset guitars resident bass player.
'Are you trying to seduce me Mrs Robinson? Or do you just want me to solder a couple of resistors into your Muff?'

User avatar
neutralomen
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by neutralomen » Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:11 pm

s_mcsleazy wrote:i'd rock one..... granted i'd most likely put a jazzy trem on it but i would still rock it
That would throw the WHOLE DESIGN OFF YOU MADMAN!

XD

User avatar
Rgand
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:55 pm

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by Rgand » Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:20 pm

How about putting a Bigsby on one. :w00t:

User avatar
neutralomen
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by neutralomen » Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:31 pm

Rgand wrote:How about putting a Bigsby on one.
nooooo this has all gone to hell!!

User avatar
s_mcsleazy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 18438
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:30 am
Location: glasgow

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by s_mcsleazy » Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:52 am

duo-sonic bridge?
offset guitars resident bass player.
'Are you trying to seduce me Mrs Robinson? Or do you just want me to solder a couple of resistors into your Muff?'

User avatar
soggy mittens
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2086
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 2:08 am
Location: middle of somewhere

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by soggy mittens » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:29 am

the original jagstang was such a fucking train wreck of an eyesore, good to see a proper version being made, good stuff! ;)
If OSG has tort me anything...

User avatar
Rgand
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:55 pm

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by Rgand » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:08 am

soggy mittens wrote:the original jagstang was such a fucking train wreck of an eyesore, good to see a proper version being made, good stuff!
This sums it up.

User avatar
neutralomen
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by neutralomen » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:12 pm

By the way, what do you guys think we should do about depth? Fender guitars are 1.75'' deep, but mustangs are 1.5''. Does anyone know how deep the Jagstang was?

I feel like it might be fun to make a contourless slab body with 1.5, and another with contours at 1.75. Fiesta Red and Daphne blue, respectively.

I will not be doing Sonic blue. That color just looks like toothpaste when it's new.

User avatar
Rgand
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:55 pm

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by Rgand » Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:45 pm

I am just getting started on a new build and the body will be 1 5/8" thick, like some Fenders and Squiers. That 1/8" makes a big difference for parts installation and weight. I'd stay away from 1 3/4" on one of these. 1 1/2" would be really fun to play with the short scale neck but with a full 25 1/2" scale neck, it might be a bit neck heavy.

User avatar
neutralomen
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by neutralomen » Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:51 pm

Rgand wrote:I am just getting started on a new build and the body will be 1 5/8" thick, like some Fenders and Squiers. That 1/8" makes a big difference for parts installation and weight. I'd stay away from 1 3/4" on one of these. 1 1/2" would be really fun to play with the short scale neck but with a full 25 1/2" scale neck, it might be a bit neck heavy.
This will definitely be short scale. So maybe I should split the difference? 1 3/4' inch body depth?

User avatar
Rgand
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:55 pm

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by Rgand » Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:53 pm

neutralomen wrote:
Rgand wrote:I am just getting started on a new build and the body will be 1 5/8" thick, like some Fenders and Squiers. That 1/8" makes a big difference for parts installation and weight. I'd stay away from 1 3/4" on one of these. 1 1/2" would be really fun to play with the short scale neck but with a full 25 1/2" scale neck, it might be a bit neck heavy.
This will definitely be short scale. So maybe I should split the difference? 1 3/4' inch body depth?
Wouldn't 1 5/8" be the split?

User avatar
neutralomen
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by neutralomen » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:20 pm

Rgand wrote:
neutralomen wrote:
Rgand wrote:I am just getting started on a new build and the body will be 1 5/8" thick, like some Fenders and Squiers. That 1/8" makes a big difference for parts installation and weight. I'd stay away from 1 3/4" on one of these. 1 1/2" would be really fun to play with the short scale neck but with a full 25 1/2" scale neck, it might be a bit neck heavy.
This will definitely be short scale. So maybe I should split the difference? 1 3/4' inch body depth?
Wouldn't 1 5/8" be the split?
I'm not so good with maths.

User avatar
Rgand
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:55 pm

Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0

Post by Rgand » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:34 pm

I'd go with the 1 5/8", too.

Post Reply