Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
- JVG
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1412
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 9:54 pm
- Location: Sydney, Straya
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
I'd strongly suggest the Jag body thickness, with contours. Maybe a bit more subtle on the arm contour, compared to a jag. The mustang looks ok without contours because it's such a small (and thin) body. Yours will look too "planky" without contours.
Btw, stop fiddling with the body outline shape now - it's fckn perfect!
Btw, stop fiddling with the body outline shape now - it's fckn perfect!
- soggy mittens
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 2:08 am
- Location: middle of somewhere
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
+1 for contours and depth thick enough for trem pool mods (blasphemy i know)
If OSG has tort me anything...
- neutralomen
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
If I catch any of your putting Jag trems in these or hard tail strat bridges, SO HELP ME!!soggy mittens wrote:+1 for contours and depth thick enough for trem pool mods (blasphemy i know)
- dmb
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:28 pm
- Location: Wy Yung, VIC, Australia
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
Since you've nailed this, you really must start working on a non-reverse super sonic plan. Go on, you know you want to!
- neutralomen
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
I do commission work! It's usually for character art and animation for Indie games, but guitar design would be fun! Feel free to PM me about it =]dmb wrote:Since you've nailed this, you really must start working on a non-reverse super sonic plan. Go on, you know you want to!
- Rgand
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:55 pm
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
A Tele ashtray bridge is ok, then?neutralomen wrote:If I catch any of your putting Jag trems in these or hard tail strat bridges, SO HELP ME!!soggy mittens wrote:+1 for contours and depth thick enough for trem pool mods (blasphemy i know)
- neutralomen
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
Ohhh youRgand wrote:A Tele ashtray bridge is ok, then?neutralomen wrote:If I catch any of your putting Jag trems in these or hard tail strat bridges, SO HELP ME!!soggy mittens wrote:+1 for contours and depth thick enough for trem pool mods (blasphemy i know)
- inkeye
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1412
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 11:17 am
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
This is the one that I built with the help of some friends.
It is technically my son's guitar even though he is just a toddler. He'll grow into it.
It is technically my son's guitar even though he is just a toddler. He'll grow into it.
- neutralomen
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
Hey thanks for sharing! That's really neat! I will say that the reason I started this project was to reconcile a thing I saw as a flaw in previous attempts, which is the sheer difference in size between the jag and mustang.inkeye wrote:This is the one that I built with the help of some friends.
It is technically my son's guitar even though he is just a toddler. He'll grow into it.
I think for that one, the bottom is just too large and wide when balanced against the small size of the mustang's profile and hardware. They wind up looking bottom heavy imo.
This other bit is a matter of taste, but like I said in my intro, I also prefer the convex mustang control plate combined with the offset body. That's a hip relationship to my eye.
Anyway thanks for sharing your work! If I ever manage to get this puppy made, I eagerly anticipate your guys's feedback
- Rgand
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:55 pm
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
Looks good, Inkeye. Nice work, there. I like those hardtail plates. Is that one from Faction?
- palesnow67
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:07 pm
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
Would you be able to put in the rhythm circuit? or would ti be too big for it?
10. Signatures must be no more than two lines.
- BlixaFan
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2759
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:37 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
i would love to see this happen.
- neutralomen
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:19 am
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
Another update! check the op for the description!
- King Volcano
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:06 pm
- paulnewman
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:27 pm
Re: Reviving the Jagstang 2.0
Just take my wallet. That thing is beautiful.