What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

For help with setups and other technical issues.
Post Reply
User avatar
dbishopbliss
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 5:14 pm

What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by dbishopbliss » Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:23 am

I just bought a used Vintage Modified Mustang with the height adjustable saddles. I would like to have a fixed radius bridge (9.5") instead. I know there is the Mastery bridge, but I don't want to spend more on the bridge than I did the guitar. :unsure: And I'm not much of a tremolo user so I will probably be locking it down.

I'm finding it hard to find information on this board about bridges for a Mustang because most of the links come back for Jazzmasters or Jaguars using mustang-style bridges. Lots of recommendations for a Staytrem bridge, but since they are not shipping outside the U.K. I'm not sure that is a viable option.

So what do people recommend?

User avatar
timtam
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:42 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by timtam » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:26 am

The 9.5" fixed radius option is the Mustang-style bridge that first appeared on the Am Pro jaguars and jazzmasters. In 2018 its E-E spacing was reduced to ~52mm.

https://darrenriley.com/store/fender-am ... 709942000/
"I just knew I wanted to make a sound that was the complete opposite of a Les Paul, and that’s pretty much a Jaguar." Rowland S. Howard.

User avatar
Debaser
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 417
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:12 pm
Location: Phoenix AZ

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by Debaser » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:35 am

The newest Am Pro bridge would be my choice. I'd get the nylon bushings that stop the rocking motion, since you plan on hard-tailing (good idea :))
50,000 watts out of Mexico, this is the BorderRadio...

User avatar
Danley
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2103
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:46 am
Location: California Republic

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by Danley » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:42 am

I agree American Pro/Performer is probably fine and the best option, with or without the nylon spacers.

Come to think of it I don't think I've ever seen a picture of a Mustang with a Mastery - It's an assumption but for those who do use the vibrato, it seems like there would be *way* too much string movement on a Mustang, for the Mastery to deal with. Is that correct?
King Buzzo: I love when people come up to me and say “Your guitar sound was better on Stoner Witch, when you used a Les Paul. “...I used a Fender Mustang reissue on that, dumbass!

User avatar
601210
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:55 am

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by 601210 » Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:53 am

You could always set the radius once and then loctite the adjustment screws into place...

User avatar
dbishopbliss
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 5:14 pm

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by dbishopbliss » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:16 am

timtam wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:26 am
The 9.5" fixed radius option is the Mustang-style bridge that first appeared on the Am Pro jaguars and jazzmasters. In 2018 its E-E spacing was reduced to ~52mm.

https://darrenriley.com/store/fender-am ... 709942000/
Sorry for my ignorance... is ~52mm a good thing or bad thing with regard to the Mustang?

User avatar
HNB
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 13539
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 7:55 am
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Contact:

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by HNB » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:29 am

It means the strings are a little closer together and not as close to the edge of the fretboard. :)
Christopher
Lilith Guitars

User avatar
Blomberg
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2019 7:59 am
Location: Denmark

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by Blomberg » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:56 am

dbishopbliss wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:16 am
Sorry for my ignorance... is ~52mm a good thing or bad thing with regard to the Mustang?
Depends who you ask ;)

A lot of people like it because of what HNB said.

I prefer the vintage spacing myself, 52mm just feels and looks wrong to me.

User avatar
MechaBulletBill
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 8:16 am
Location: UK

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by MechaBulletBill » Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:33 pm

dbishopbliss wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:16 am
timtam wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:26 am
The 9.5" fixed radius option is the Mustang-style bridge that first appeared on the Am Pro jaguars and jazzmasters. In 2018 its E-E spacing was reduced to ~52mm.

https://darrenriley.com/store/fender-am ... 709942000/
Sorry for my ignorance... is ~52mm a good thing or bad thing with regard to the Mustang?
I prefer the narrower spacing generally (man, most non-Tele fenders seem to have the Es really close to the fretboard edge!!!), but with the mustang specifically there can be a bit of sideways pull over the saddles because the bridge is so close to the tailpiece which is spaced wider than 52mm. Might be negligible, might not.

User avatar
timtam
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:42 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by timtam » Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:24 pm

dbishopbliss wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:16 am
timtam wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:26 am
The 9.5" fixed radius option is the Mustang-style bridge that first appeared on the Am Pro jaguars and jazzmasters. In 2018 its E-E spacing was reduced to ~52mm.

https://darrenriley.com/store/fender-am ... 709942000/
Sorry for my ignorance... is ~52mm a good thing or bad thing with regard to the Mustang?
The bridge you have now is presumably the 0081239001 / 0054447049.
https://www.guitarpartsfactory.us/index ... ct_id=2336

You can measure its E-E spacing; it's usually around 55-56mm, or 11.2mm between strings. With 52mm it's 10.4mm between strings. So it's not that different. It was changed on the Am Pro because the original necks were prone to the E slipping off the edge. You may or may not have that issue.

The Mastery and Staytrem also have 52mm E-E. A number of premium offsets are now stock with 52mm bridges, eg Marr jaguar, Am Pro jag and JM. Most tunomatics are around 52mm. The vintage jag/JM bridge with threaded barrel saddles can have whatever spacing you want (within limits of where the threads fall).
https://www.vguitarforums.com/smf/index ... pic=8612.0

55-56mm is fine on many guitars. But those who have an issue with E slipping off often switch to 52mm. I am not sure that we have had many people who had an issue with a 52mm bridge being too narrow. The only 9.5" fixed radius option that has 55-56mm now would be a original Am Pro bridge. Unlike the Marr jaguar (7.25 radius), which changed its bridge part number when it went narrower, the Am Pro bridge did not change part number (7709942000). But most aftermarket sources should now be selling the 52mm version (always good to check, if that's what you want). The only real way to tell if a bridge that comes off an Am Pro or Marr guitar is 52mm or 56mm is to measure it.

In addition to the 9.5 radius/52mm Am Pro bridge, you may find the 9.5 radius version of the Staytrem (52mm) somewhere online (ebay, reverb), but it probably won't be cheap.
"I just knew I wanted to make a sound that was the complete opposite of a Les Paul, and that’s pretty much a Jaguar." Rowland S. Howard.

User avatar
jorri
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3045
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 1:53 am
Location: bath, UK
Contact:

Re: What's the latest on bridges for a Mustang?

Post by jorri » Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:13 am

Yeh i don't like 52mm, but that might be a minority. Just is to do with right hand technique i think, being a hard player or a fingerstyle player. Not had the fingerboard issue of anything falling off.. As far as sometimes shimming out the saddles actually, I just really don't like small gap between E and A and it makes the spacing feel uneven too.

Post Reply