Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

For help with setups and other technical issues.
User avatar
dylanafghjkl
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 8:59 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by dylanafghjkl » Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:25 am

looks cool but i always feel like you sacrifice intonation when using 3 adjustment screws rather than one per string, even if it's compensated
that being said my favourite guitar i own at the moment is a kawai with one of these sort of bridges
Image

also re: wax potting a bridge - wouldn't wax be soft enough that you could still adjust the screws through it?

User avatar
redchapterjubilee
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1777
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:01 am
Location: AVLNC

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by redchapterjubilee » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:57 am

I'd love for someone to get bridge blanks and drill for normal Mustang saddles at a flatter radius, i.e. just making a regular Mustang bridge at 9.5 radius. That is essentially what a Staytrem is but I'm thinking something even simpler in design. The only reason I ever feel the need to use anything other than a Mustang bridge is if the guitar isn't 7.25 radius. Then you kinda have to use something else, or shim a Mustang bridge. Seems if someone could get bridge blanks and drill them for 9.5 with Mustang saddles and sell them at $40 you'd do decent business.

User avatar
601210
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:55 am

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by 601210 » Wed Apr 25, 2018 6:36 am

redchapterjubilee wrote:
Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:57 am
I'd love for someone to get bridge blanks and drill for normal Mustang saddles at a flatter radius, i.e. just making a regular Mustang bridge at 9.5 radius. That is essentially what a Staytrem is but I'm thinking something even simpler in design. The only reason I ever feel the need to use anything other than a Mustang bridge is if the guitar isn't 7.25 radius. Then you kinda have to use something else, or shim a Mustang bridge. Seems if someone could get bridge blanks and drill them for 9.5 with Mustang saddles and sell them at $40 you'd do decent business.
I don't think you can really "drill" mustang saddles to a different radius, the radius is a result of the size of the saddles themselves.

User avatar
redchapterjubilee
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1777
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:01 am
Location: AVLNC

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by redchapterjubilee » Wed Apr 25, 2018 4:52 pm

The saddles no, but the bridge yes. You would have to have a blank bridge that has not been drilled for saddles. Not sure if those blanks are easy to obtain.

User avatar
mizbiz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by mizbiz » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:08 pm

I think what 601210 meant is that it is entirely irrelevant where the location of the intonation screw holes sit on the bridge base. Because the mustang saddles have a fixed height, the only way to modify the radius on them is to either sand them down lower or shim them up higher. There are no height/radius adjustment grub screws on mustang saddles.

Image

User avatar
601210
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:55 am

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by 601210 » Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:23 am

^ what he said.

Actually looking at it now, if you wanted a ready-made solution surely it isn't that hard to machine a slotted shim that just slips under the saddles and corrects the radius for all 6 at the same time?

User avatar
mizbiz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by mizbiz » Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:56 am

601210 wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:23 am
^ what he said.

Actually looking at it now, if you wanted a ready-made solution surely it isn't that hard to machine a slotted shim that just slips under the saddles and corrects the radius for all 6 at the same time?
^^^Great idea!

Or if someone was able to develop a method to precision machine the center saddles only removing a fraction of the bottom of the existing saddles to convert it to a 9.5" radius, that might be a more cost effective solution since no new parts would have to be manufactured.

User avatar
mizbiz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by mizbiz » Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:07 am

Hell, come to think of it, why hasn't anyone come up with a new set of replacement 9.5" radius metal mustang saddle barrels that simply drop into the existing bridge and use the existing intonation screws/springs? It would be even more rad if they came in various metal types (i.e. brass, steel, stainless steel, chromed, titanium). That seems like the most simple and cost effective solution cause it would only be the cost of manufacturing the barrel saddles themselves.

I mean, it certainly is a variation of using GraphTech saddles as a solution, but it seems like one that would be more readily acceptable and utilized since most agree that the GraphTech ones present issues because 1) they are not wide enough and shimmy around, and 2) are not conductive, rendering the post/thimble grounding ineffective. Basically, they suck.

User avatar
arkivel
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1073
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:30 pm
Location: Kitsilano

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by arkivel » Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:37 am

The string spacing would still be too far apart using a Mustang bridge - either Fender or aftermarket. Having said that, designing a functioning bridge should not be rocket science. The Staytrem bridge gets you 90% the way there. The only thing to improve is making it a fixed bridge and precision machined saddle grooves with harder chrome plating like the Mastery bridge.

User avatar
Embenny
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 10363
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 5:07 am

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by Embenny » Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:40 pm

arkivel wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:37 am
The string spacing would still be too far apart using a Mustang bridge - either Fender or aftermarket. Having said that, designing a functioning bridge should not be rocket science. The Staytrem bridge gets you 90% the way there. The only thing to improve is making it a fixed bridge and precision machined saddle grooves with harder chrome plating like the Mastery bridge.
Staytrem offers a fixed-bridge version. You just have to specify that when you order.
The artist formerly known as mbene085.

User avatar
mizbiz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by mizbiz » Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:54 pm

arkivel wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:37 am
The string spacing would still be too far apart using a Mustang bridge
Really? I've never heard that before... not being a smartass, but is it too far apart on the mustang as well? I just assumed the Jags and Jazzmasters had the same fretboard width as the mustang, and therefore the same string spacing too. I genuinely am ignorant on this. In fact, I use real mustang bridges (not aftermarket) on some of my offsets and the only thing I've ever noticed is the discrepancy in radius.

User avatar
arkivel
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1073
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:30 pm
Location: Kitsilano

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by arkivel » Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:13 pm

mbene085 wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:40 pm
arkivel wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:37 am
The string spacing would still be too far apart using a Mustang bridge - either Fender or aftermarket. Having said that, designing a functioning bridge should not be rocket science. The Staytrem bridge gets you 90% the way there. The only thing to improve is making it a fixed bridge and precision machined saddle grooves with harder chrome plating like the Mastery bridge.
Staytrem offers a fixed-bridge version. You just have to specify that when you order.
Problem still is that staytrem saddles are not precision polished and hard chromed so you can't really use the vibrato if the bridge is fixed. They advise against it.

User avatar
arkivel
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1073
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:30 pm
Location: Kitsilano

Re: Designing a bridge for the Jazzmaster/Jaguar

Post by arkivel » Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:18 pm

mizbiz wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:54 pm
arkivel wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:37 am
The string spacing would still be too far apart using a Mustang bridge
Really? I've never heard that before... not being a smartass, but is it too far apart on the mustang as well? I just assumed the Jags and Jazzmasters had the same fretboard width as the mustang, and therefore the same string spacing too. I genuinely am ignorant on this. In fact, I use real mustang bridges (not aftermarket) on some of my offsets and the only thing I've ever noticed is the discrepancy in radius.
Mustang bridges tend to be spaced too wide and the e strings tend to fall off the fretboard. System and Mastery have a more narrow string spacing to fix this. Some actually prefer the stock jazzmaster saddles to mustang saddles for this reason

Post Reply