My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Discussion of newer designs, copies and reissue offset-waist instruments.
User avatar
scottme
Expat
Expat
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:57 pm
Location: Newcastle
Contact:

My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by scottme » Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:51 pm

Greeting all!

I finally received my new 66 JM last week after a few months delay:

Image

Image

Image

Image

All the hardware looks great and the actions is nice. Nice case. Not quite as nice sounding as my 78. Has significant checking.

Decided to take a look under the hood, starting with the neck.

Image

and

Image

Hmmm..... Supposed to be 66. Looks a bit like 13FEB68B. The other clues:

Tuners removed:

Image

Double drilled ,although I think 66s had that "feature".

Checking OVER the decal:

Image

Insides look pretty good, can't read the PU sig though

Image

Image

Serial is for late 65 early 66, Vol pot is 8th week of 66 (CTS). Tone is an odd pot (dont have the codes with me).

So, is this possibly a nice partscaster?

User avatar
Aug
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 333
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:17 pm

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by Aug » Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:55 pm

I HATE YOU!  >:(

f'ing sweet guitar...gotta love the blocks and binding.  :?

User avatar
Pumpkin
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1210
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:02 am

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by Pumpkin » Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:56 pm

cool,i got severe jazzmaster gas lately so because of this I'l go hide in the corner and sulk.:)

User avatar
i love sharin foo
Mods
Mods
Posts: 5661
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:26 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by i love sharin foo » Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:21 pm

That heel stamp looks like a 66 to me. I'm not sure if the necks from '68 would have still had the Strat code either. Usually they would've been drilled for Klusons then had the F style tunes installed instead woudln't they? Maybe it came factory equipped with the F tuners and someone later switched to the set of double line Klusons that it has now. '68 probably would have had the black decal and a poly finish as well. Overall I think it looks pretty straight.

Justin
A death’s head ring upon his finger

User avatar
Hellion
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:24 am
Location: DC area

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by Hellion » Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:33 pm

[quote="Aug"]
I HATE YOU!   >:(

It sucks to be rich and famous--or to at least feel that way with such a MASSIVE guitar. Cheers!
What's he building in there?

User avatar
fullerplast
Mods
Mods
Posts: 12710
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:53 am
Location: In My Room

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by fullerplast » Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:39 pm

It all looks good to me Scott. Nice score!   :?

Sometimes they doweled the unused holes, sometimes not. It can go either way, either Kluson or F-tuner with an extra set of holes (although more often it seems F-tuners are installed and the Kluson holes are left over). But this seems to be an early '66... nothing suspicious as far as I can see. The pots are sometimes mixed as well, usually CTS (137) mixed with Stackpole (304). See if you can find the code.  If the worst thing is that one pot has been replaced, that hardly qualifies it as a Partsmaster, IMO.

So the decal is under the lacquer? That seems odd for a '66.  I can't read that stamp at all, don't know if it's my resolution or my eyes! I see the 13 and a smudge of red and that's it. By the way, a '68 would have '66 pots.

It's beautiful!   :-*  
Last edited by fullerplast on Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Q. Are we not men?

User avatar
scottme
Expat
Expat
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:57 pm
Location: Newcastle
Contact:

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by scottme » Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:46 pm

Thanks guys. I haven't checked in the trem cavity as yet, but I will as soon as I can.Maybe someone went to some effort to convert the neck to a 66? The 13 code was still around in early 68.

User avatar
daydreamdelay
Mods
Mods
Posts: 5932
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:56 am

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by daydreamdelay » Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:04 pm

seems a little odd to me compared to my current and previous 66's

both codes on mine have black ink, I've only seen red on later versions.. both logo's were positioned differently, on top of the lacquer, and had blackened and slightly chipped over time. this logo looks brand new because it was lacquered over, the string tree and pickup covers look brand new also.. maybe it is a later version that's headstock was redone?

looks great either way.. mine finally has a twin on the board  :)



Image

Image
Last edited by daydreamdelay on Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
fullerplast
Mods
Mods
Posts: 12710
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:53 am
Location: In My Room

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by fullerplast » Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:10 pm

Thats true about the ink.
Q. Are we not men?

User avatar
i love sharin foo
Mods
Mods
Posts: 5661
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:26 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by i love sharin foo » Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:27 pm

I never really thought about the color of it. My '66 has the stamp in black.

Justin
A death’s head ring upon his finger

User avatar
slomomarc
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:18 pm
Location: Halifax, UK
Contact:

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by slomomarc » Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:18 pm

Nice looking Jazzmaster...............The block and bound necks always look really cool..................I'll have to put one on my shopping list ;)

User avatar
mezcalhead
Admin
Admin
Posts: 11566
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:18 am
Location: Swampland

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by mezcalhead » Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:26 am

The '66/'68 issue is interesting, and FWIW in that photo I definitely agree with Justin that the second-last letter of the stamp looks like a "6" .. although you're right there with it and can see it better than any of us can.

The bottom line, however, is that you have a damn excellent guitar there. Congratulations!
Distance-crunching honcho with echo unit.

User avatar
fullerplast
Mods
Mods
Posts: 12710
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:53 am
Location: In My Room

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by fullerplast » Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:47 am

The bottom line, however, is that you have a damn excellent guitar there. Congratulations!
Amen Bro!
Q. Are we not men?

User avatar
scottme
Expat
Expat
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:57 pm
Location: Newcastle
Contact:

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by scottme » Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:01 pm

Yes, I can't complain either way, even as a good condition 68, still a good price. I would assume that if it was glossed over, it seems like a good job and was probably done a while ago. A concern is that maybe the top coat was rather different material, so there will be major checking / finish cracking as time goes by.

The tremelo cavity:

Image

To the left of the cavity as shown, if you look closely, it looks a bit like a 6 and 8. Does anyone have pics of 66-68 date lettering on the body?

The tone pot has the following codes on the side:

134 117
BAO 11-346
1 MEG - C1

User avatar
fullerplast
Mods
Mods
Posts: 12710
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:53 am
Location: In My Room

Re: My new sweet 66 JAZZMASTER

Post by fullerplast » Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:24 pm

I have a set of those 134 pots right now. They have the same odd numbers under the first line.

Mine are:

134 7146
BAB 11  6374

But they have no value under that. I didn't even look them up to see the manufacturer, but I have a feeling they are CentraLab.

So that one pot has been replaced, not too uncommon. If you want to replace it, theoretically 1966 pots should be the easiest to come by (since they were used for so many years).

Dammit... I can't see any markings in there either, not even a trace. I must have a "date mark filter" turned on!

Your Jazzmaster is in great condition...
Q. Are we not men?

Post Reply