Adjusting for mismatched neck and bridge radius

Discussion of newer designs, copies and reissue offset-waist instruments.
Post Reply
User avatar
Elixxrx66
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:39 pm

Adjusting for mismatched neck and bridge radius

Post by Elixxrx66 » Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:17 pm

I have a roller bridge with a 12” radius on my jazzmaster with a neck with a radius of 9.5”. It helps it stay in tune when using the vibrato bar but I do notice the action being a little off on the high e side making the high e side slightly higher than I’d like. Since it’s a roller bridge I obviously can’t file the saddles on the bridge so I went and adjusted it by filing the nut slots instead. It seems to have worked okay. The action now reads 1.5mm on the high e side just like I like it. I guess it doesn’t matter really at this point but I was just wondering if others had done this as well? Thanks

User avatar
Debaser
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 417
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:12 pm
Location: Phoenix AZ

Re: Adjusting for mismatched neck and bridge radius

Post by Debaser » Sun Aug 11, 2019 3:51 pm

Filing the nut slot to lower the string isn’t how to adjust playing action, or adjust for radius mismatches. If it made it better, then it was likely too high to begin with. When you press down a string between the 2nd and 3rd fret, look back to see how much clearance you have to the 1st fret. I use a paper’s width on the plain strings. If a string touches the fret, well you likely went too far. Buzzing will occur. The wound strings need a little more clearance, and again I eyeball it. A business cards width for the low E.

Glad it worked out though. I tried asking ABM if they could make a 9.5” roller, but they said cost is prohibitive. Seems kinda silly though, they can machine the same bridge body, and merely make a few more saddles with difference specs. For the money they charge, surely they could do this :fp:
50,000 watts out of Mexico, this is the BorderRadio...

User avatar
Larry Mal
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 19724
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:25 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO

Re: Adjusting for mismatched neck and bridge radius

Post by Larry Mal » Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:23 pm

It's quite possible that you ended up with three radii, the one that the bridge is, the one that the neck is, and now your nut is very possibly a different radius than either of those.

Or maybe you got lucky, and you got the nut radius to be the same as one of the other two factors, even while lowering it.

Beats me. Glad it's playing well for you- welcome to the site.
Back in those days, everyone knew that if you were talking about Destiny's Child, you were talking about Beyonce, LaTavia, LeToya, and Larry.

User avatar
Embenny
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 10363
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 5:07 am

Re: Adjusting for mismatched neck and bridge radius

Post by Embenny » Sun Aug 11, 2019 7:03 pm

Yep, as was already said, that's not a solution to that problem.

Filing a nut only helps when the string is open. The second a string is fretted, whatever was happening at the nut becomes utterly irrelevant.
The artist formerly known as mbene085.

User avatar
Larry Mal
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 19724
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:25 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO

Re: Adjusting for mismatched neck and bridge radius

Post by Larry Mal » Sun Aug 11, 2019 7:14 pm

Also, if you are that committed to the 12" radius, you could have a good technician make your frets be a 12" radius to match your bridge. Not your fingerboard, necessarily (although that is possible also), but your frets. And then you can make sure that your nut is sorted out and then you have an instrument that is in agreement as far as radius goes.

I read your post about your guitar, and this is one of the things that I absolutely loathe about how Fender was making these guitars. Now, I guess I'm a boring traditionalist who thinks that Leo got it right the first time regarding the Jazzmaster, but Christ, modern era Fender was really puking these things out with no care at all about what they were doing. Putting lame, old and cheap Gibson parts on the guitars with mismatched radius between the fretboard and the bridge just really says that a company doesn't care at all about what they are doing.

Regardless, you like your guitar. There are certainly ways to make it play very well, and there are a lot of ways to make the radius of a Fender guitar be flatter. That thing I mentioned about the frets but not the fingerboard being made to be a specific radius was something I read that Stevie Ray Vaughn did- he's huge on this forum, it's all Stevie all the time. Anyway, his tech flattened the frets to being a 12" radius over the course of some fret levels and that's where they ended up.
Back in those days, everyone knew that if you were talking about Destiny's Child, you were talking about Beyonce, LaTavia, LeToya, and Larry.

User avatar
Elixxrx66
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:39 pm

Re: Adjusting for mismatched neck and bridge radius

Post by Elixxrx66 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:18 pm

Thanks for all the advice. You would think fender would have thought about that. I forgot to mention I was using a preslotted tusq nut. As for the 3 different radiuses for the bridge, neck and nut I’d never even thought of that. All I know is now it measures 2mm on the low e side and 1.5mm on the high e side so that’s what I’m going by. I have always played Gibson style guitars with a 12” radius neck and a 12” radius bridge. All of this neck/bridge radius is completely new to me

User avatar
601210
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:55 am

Re: Adjusting for mismatched neck and bridge radius

Post by 601210 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:06 pm

If it's higher on one E string than another, it could also be
  1. You're measuring from the top of the string instead of under, or
  2. Your height adjustment between the two posts are off. I would have tried the thumbwheel on one side before filing anything, personally. If the action is off because of radius mismatch then it should be off uniformly on both sides, right?
But seeing as you've done something and it seems to have helped I guess there's no point arguing what you should have or have not done.

Post Reply