wooderson wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:31 pm
mackerelmint wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 3:29 pm
You're the one who jumped on MY head here, dude. I just pointed out the hypocrisy of a guy whose stated values and observable behavior are complete opposites and I'm maintaining my position.
Yes, and your position is wrong. There is nothing "hypocritical" or "completely opposite" about Morello appearing in a video for Fender any more than in his band being signed to a major label or selling CDs at Best Buy.
*cough cough* That's it right there, but we could add sponsorships and advertising he's done prior. I guess we just have to disagree here.
I don't care about RATM or Morello in particular but this line is a tiresome strawman that gets dragged out for every anti-capitalist artist from RATM to Billy Bragg to Propaghandi.
wooderson wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:31 pm
What do you think Marxist means? (It's certainly far from a work of activism but it's a goofy video that didn't perpetuate any kind of harm.)
At the very least, it means not lending your likeness to the kinds of companies you posture against to help them sell merchandise and their intangible brand. Or one could say that I think it disqualifies one from truthfully claiming to be a Marxist or fairly opens them up to criticism from anyone who's read Marx on the basis of hypocrisy. As for what I think a "Marxist" is, does it matter? There are a zillion self-described marxists out there who believe all kinds of things. As far as I can tell the only thing they all have in common is holding the idea of capitalism static while they duck around the many failures of Marx's premises either through updated new ones or simply denying reality and attacking the apostates. And steadfast belief in state control of all physical capital as well as not helping large private firms from a top-down position.
wooderson wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:31 pm
You said earlier that if he was doing this with an 'indie' builder it wouldn't be hypocritical - Doug Kauer is a business owner and an employer, just like FMIC - why would that make it okay? If the working conditions of the people who built these are irrelevant (as you replied to my comment re: the role of Master Builders) then Kauer being a small-timer should also be irrelevant.
I'll just quote you here:
appearing in a video with these (absolutely hideous) guitars built by well-paid artisans is more politically appropriate for him than a video for an assembly-line guitar. Alienation of labor, etc..
Well, I brought up Doug because he owns his means of production and while I didn't specifically bring up the working conditions of anyone, Doug works in the same conditions as his employees and there's a whole hell of a lot less income disparity happening there. That isn't at all the case at Fender, who have operations all over the world to build instruments to all kinds of price points with differing conditions and levels of alienation evidenced. And you're correct that I alluded to working conditions, but how can you say that I called or even suggested they were irrelevant? My position is the opposite of what you're claiming, and you're grumpy because you think you see me making a straw man argument? Sir, your assertion that I claimed working conditions irrelevant is the literal definition of a straw man argument.
Doug's a guy with a shop and a little help making things at the top of the market. Fender custom shop is also making things at the top of the market. It's around 10K for a custom shop instrument, I think. Doug sells for way less, and it all just goes to alienation of labor, doesn't it? Fender takes a much larger profit for a comparable instrument. In the case of these ones, the added labor of programming a CNC and finishing the instrument in a bit more detail does not triple the labor inputs... and since we have to adhere to labor value theory to keep this restricted to marxist terms, the additional cost of production is irrelevant. Yet these guitars cost triple what another CS fender does. Gosh! So that money just goes to the haute bourgeoisie while Morello sits there with a grin on his face, furthering the brand of a privately held multinational. And even if one rejects the idea that he's up there "selling", so what?
And before I go, I'd like to just say that you opened this debate by describing my criticism as a "tiresome joke" and just keep moaning about how tedious you find this argument you admit to having picked and keep furthering. Like a putz. I'm not interested in a bloodsport argument over something like this with someone who acts put upon for having started it. Good lord.