Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
-
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:25 pm
Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
I’m looking for ideas and suggestions for my situation.
If you had ~ $3k to spend would you A) Buy a Fender reissue and upgrade hardware as needed B) have something built by Danocaster or Creston or another small builder or C) add another $1500-2k to that and buy a pre-cbs refin?
If you had ~ $3k to spend would you A) Buy a Fender reissue and upgrade hardware as needed B) have something built by Danocaster or Creston or another small builder or C) add another $1500-2k to that and buy a pre-cbs refin?
- Mechanical Birds
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 1:24 pm
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
Bilt Relevator with every possible upgrade and have money left over
-
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2831
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:12 am
- Location: U.S. of fuckin' A.
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
vintage v. boutique, name brand v. "parts" or "custom".
I'd say it depends on whether you care about colors/features/hardware/condition. Can you play the guitar before you buy it? Are you interested in historical or resale value?
I just finished a parts guitar, which I put together because I could choose what I wanted without having to "upgrade" or "mod" anything. As much as I'd love to own a vintage Fender, if I had that much money I would get a luthier to make me something to my own tastes and specifications. If you have the money, there is no way someone can't build you something as good as a Fender. If you disagree, there's custom shop as well. Vintage is awesome, but there's no magic to it, they just made some good guitars. I'd rather have a guitar look and feel how I like, with all my desired hardware and pickups, then to have something nice and old that I wish I could change.
No one in my life is going to give a shit if my guitar is a vintage Fender, or whether the paint is original or refin, and I don't either. You might, though, and there's certainly nothing wrong with that.
I'd say it depends on whether you care about colors/features/hardware/condition. Can you play the guitar before you buy it? Are you interested in historical or resale value?
I just finished a parts guitar, which I put together because I could choose what I wanted without having to "upgrade" or "mod" anything. As much as I'd love to own a vintage Fender, if I had that much money I would get a luthier to make me something to my own tastes and specifications. If you have the money, there is no way someone can't build you something as good as a Fender. If you disagree, there's custom shop as well. Vintage is awesome, but there's no magic to it, they just made some good guitars. I'd rather have a guitar look and feel how I like, with all my desired hardware and pickups, then to have something nice and old that I wish I could change.
No one in my life is going to give a shit if my guitar is a vintage Fender, or whether the paint is original or refin, and I don't either. You might, though, and there's certainly nothing wrong with that.
- Beyer160
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:34 am
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
D) Add less than $1K and find a good '70s Fender, Jazzmasters didn't seem to suffer as badly from '70s shittiness as their other instruments. Probably because most of the ones you see were made before '74- they didn't make many during the latter half of the decade.
- dm_cambridge_ma
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:41 am
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
I would always lean towards something you can play first. There have been guitars that made me drool online that did nothing for me in person. Personally, neck carve makes a big difference to me. At least with a Fender, swapping the neck is always an option.
Acoustic resonance, too, since I don't get to plug in that much.
Acoustic resonance, too, since I don't get to plug in that much.
-
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:25 pm
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
Singlebladepickup wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:02 amvintage v. boutique, name brand v. "parts" or "custom".
I'd say it depends on whether you care about colors/features/hardware/condition. Can you play the guitar before you buy it? Are you interested in historical or resale value?
I just finished a parts guitar, which I put together because I could choose what I wanted without having to "upgrade" or "mod" anything. As much as I'd love to own a vintage Fender, if I had that much money I would get a luthier to make me something to my own tastes and specifications. If you have the money, there is no way someone can't build you something as good as a Fender. If you disagree, there's custom shop as well. Vintage is awesome, but there's no magic to it, they just made some good guitars. I'd rather have a guitar look and feel how I like, with all my desired hardware and pickups, then to have something nice and old that I wish I could change.
No one in my life is going to give a shit if my guitar is a vintage Fender, or whether the paint is original or refin, and I don't either. You might, though, and there's certainly nothing wrong with that.
If I go with a vintage guitar, it will be a player. I can’t afford, and honestly have no interest in, a museum piece.
Honestly, I’m really down to just a Danocaster, Creston, or a pre-cbs “player” (refin, refret, etc).
-
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2831
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:12 am
- Location: U.S. of fuckin' A.
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
I would say go for dano and get an awesome guitar with great fretwork, finishing, electronics, etc. in the color you want. If it doesn't mean that much, why pay way more for a "player". Unless you find a deal on something you can play in person and confirm is awesome. I doubt you'd keep dreaming of vintage once the Dano was delivered
- mackerelmint
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 13674
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 9:51 pm
- Location: トイレ国、ウンチ市
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
I'd go custom and get exactly what I want.
This is an excellent rectangle
-
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2831
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:12 am
- Location: U.S. of fuckin' A.
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
Same. I personally wouldn't go Dano, because I can't pay for something pre-worn if I'm buying it new. Danos seem excellent, but my dream guitar would come to me shiny and new
- drella3507
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:03 pm
- Location: Scotland
- HNB
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 13513
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 7:55 am
- Location: Puyallup, Washington
- Contact:
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
I would (and did) go Dano over vintage. I had a couple vintage guitars, but sold them off. They were old and I was always worried about wrecking something old and destroying its value. Danos feel like old guitars, but are new and play so nice. I had a Bilt also which was good. I like my Dano more. His necks just feel so good. If you like Fender looks, I would go Dano. If you like built in effects and more unusual designs, go Bilt I guess?
My Jaghammer by Danocaster.
IMG_9867 by Christopher Louck, on Flickr
My Jaghammer by Danocaster.
IMG_9867 by Christopher Louck, on Flickr
Christopher
Lilith Guitars
Lilith Guitars
- mackerelmint
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 13674
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 9:51 pm
- Location: トイレ国、ウンチ市
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
OH look, it's that fender custom shop bridge. Well, here's my obligatory post about how much I hate that thing. What an eyesore.
Does bilt do full custom stuff? I mean, they have a pretty definite look with all the switches and the headstock that looks like a foot. If relics aren't the OP's thing, maybe Ron Kirn would be a good place to make inquiries.
Does bilt do full custom stuff? I mean, they have a pretty definite look with all the switches and the headstock that looks like a foot. If relics aren't the OP's thing, maybe Ron Kirn would be a good place to make inquiries.
This is an excellent rectangle
- marqueemoon
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 9:37 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
I have the vintage and reissue bases covered already so the logical answer for me would be "small builder" so I could get some custom options. I really like what Waterslide is doing, so they would be high on the list. I wouldn't order a new guitar with a relic job either.
Not feeling the "player" thing much these days. Usually it's possible to buy a much nicer guitar for similar money.
Not feeling the "player" thing much these days. Usually it's possible to buy a much nicer guitar for similar money.
- Larsongs
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:39 pm
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
I've owned dozens of Guitars over the years. Still have quite a few. IMO, There's nothing like playing what you're interested in buying.
Especially when you're in the $3G's & up range. The only way I buy sight unseen is if there is a 30-45 day return for full refund if it's questionable or an exchange Policy.
Especially when you're in the $3G's & up range. The only way I buy sight unseen is if there is a 30-45 day return for full refund if it's questionable or an exchange Policy.
- wooderson
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:07 pm
Re: Vintage vs Reissue vs small builder
Vintage doesn't really excite me except for the Tele Deluxe (since you can't get 'real' WRHBs now that telenator closed shop), I'd probably go with a Thin Skin in Firemist Silver and upgrades. Danocasters are great but a non-reliced guitar gives you more leeway to swap things out without having it look weird because your new pickguard isn't aged or whatever.
My second option would be specing out an even more ideal build (for me candy tangerine, maybe, with matching headstock & B&B neck). Throw on a custom waterslide Masciscaster sticker, partscasters without a waterslide look wrong to me.
With GM doing the finish, binding and blocks it's about $1200 with a matching headstock. The problem there is that you're basically setting most of the money on fire if you ever go to sell it (vs. the strong resale on Thin Skins, vintage or Danocasters) but if you're confident of it being a forever-guitar that's a good route.
My second option would be specing out an even more ideal build (for me candy tangerine, maybe, with matching headstock & B&B neck). Throw on a custom waterslide Masciscaster sticker, partscasters without a waterslide look wrong to me.
With GM doing the finish, binding and blocks it's about $1200 with a matching headstock. The problem there is that you're basically setting most of the money on fire if you ever go to sell it (vs. the strong resale on Thin Skins, vintage or Danocasters) but if you're confident of it being a forever-guitar that's a good route.