Re: Would this body style be considered an offset

Discussion of newer designs, copies and reissue offset-waist instruments.
Post Reply
User avatar
Infliktor
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:47 am
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana USA
Contact:

Would this body style be considered an offset

Post by Infliktor » Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:36 pm

Image

User avatar
jrkirkish
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:41 am

Re: Would this body style be considered an offset

Post by jrkirkish » Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:33 pm

I vote no

not to say that schecter doesn't make nice guitars, though....

User avatar
donnyII
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:55 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Would this body style be considered an offset

Post by donnyII » Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:49 am

i vote no as well. 
Behold, THE WIZARD

User avatar
mezcalhead
Admin
Admin
Posts: 11566
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:18 am
Location: Swampland

Re: Would this body style be considered an offset

Post by mezcalhead » Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:24 am

The waist isn't offset .. therefore it isn't an offset-waist guitar.

:)
Distance-crunching honcho with echo unit.

User avatar
Marc
Expat
Expat
Posts: 1182
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:25 pm
Location: South West UK

Re: Would this body style be considered an offset

Post by Marc » Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:02 am

It's more of an "offputting" style.  :D
Yes the cat has opposing thumbs and extra digits.

User avatar
SPudnik
Expat
Expat
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:44 pm
Location: Parsec 351 R VA US

Re: Would this body style be considered an offset

Post by SPudnik » Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:04 pm

Not offset.

Top curve should be higher up [toward headstock]
Bass VI - A What?

Post Reply