62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
- lwatford
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:32 pm
- Location: Helena, AL
62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
I got this guitar not too long ago knowing it would be a bit of a project. I was told the body was a '62, and most of the electronics and hardware were there, so I figured it'd be a good candidate for restoration.
The good - pickups, tremolo, body, pick guard, knobs, a bit of the wiring (I think) were original.
The bad - the refinish wasn't that great - very thick feeling and goopy. Replacement bridge, main pots had been replaced, rhythm circuit wasn't wired in. The pick guard had shrunken to the point that I really didn't want to use it, and had some bad spots on it. The bridge pickup was dead (though it did come with two newer pickups).
Lastly (not really bad) it had a MIJ neck on it. I'm still not sure what I'm going to do about the neck, I've been watching for a vintage one, but I'm not sure I want to put that much into it...so maybe a nicer vintage spec neck?
Anyway...pictures!
this is how it came to me:
the refinished body:
I sent the body off to the MJT guys to see about a better refinish. Here are the stripped pictures:
and here is my update picture (Ocean Turquoise - I know it's not a period correct color, but I wanted something that would look nice with tort)
The original pickguard:
the repro PG:
wired (ended up needing to replace one of the rhythm circuit pots, and I changed the main pots to 250k):
Pickups back from Novak & Mastery bridge:
The rest of the parts, sadly in a box till the body gets back...
The good - pickups, tremolo, body, pick guard, knobs, a bit of the wiring (I think) were original.
The bad - the refinish wasn't that great - very thick feeling and goopy. Replacement bridge, main pots had been replaced, rhythm circuit wasn't wired in. The pick guard had shrunken to the point that I really didn't want to use it, and had some bad spots on it. The bridge pickup was dead (though it did come with two newer pickups).
Lastly (not really bad) it had a MIJ neck on it. I'm still not sure what I'm going to do about the neck, I've been watching for a vintage one, but I'm not sure I want to put that much into it...so maybe a nicer vintage spec neck?
Anyway...pictures!
this is how it came to me:
the refinished body:
I sent the body off to the MJT guys to see about a better refinish. Here are the stripped pictures:
and here is my update picture (Ocean Turquoise - I know it's not a period correct color, but I wanted something that would look nice with tort)
The original pickguard:
the repro PG:
wired (ended up needing to replace one of the rhythm circuit pots, and I changed the main pots to 250k):
Pickups back from Novak & Mastery bridge:
The rest of the parts, sadly in a box till the body gets back...
- fuzzking
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:06 am
- Contact:
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
Refin looking good!
But please get rid of that repro guard monstrosity and use the original one. It's not that much work to make it fit. Enlargen the screw holes and inner contours with needle file/flat file/sandpaper. Never mind the enlarged rhythm circuit hole. You'll be glad you did.
Of course you could use the MIJ neck or get a Musikraft/Warmoth/CGUSA one taylored to taste, but I feel the body deserves a vintage one in the end. Some day a beater neck might pop up that could be saved with a bit of TLC. Maybe I'm a bit militant regarding necks, but I'd take a new guitar with an old neck over the opposite any day.
Sorry for the instructional undertones...just waking up over here.
But please get rid of that repro guard monstrosity and use the original one. It's not that much work to make it fit. Enlargen the screw holes and inner contours with needle file/flat file/sandpaper. Never mind the enlarged rhythm circuit hole. You'll be glad you did.
Of course you could use the MIJ neck or get a Musikraft/Warmoth/CGUSA one taylored to taste, but I feel the body deserves a vintage one in the end. Some day a beater neck might pop up that could be saved with a bit of TLC. Maybe I'm a bit militant regarding necks, but I'd take a new guitar with an old neck over the opposite any day.
Sorry for the instructional undertones...just waking up over here.
Nobody exists on purpose.
- lwatford
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:32 pm
- Location: Helena, AL
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
fuzzking wrote:Refin looking good!
But please get rid of that repro guard monstrosity and use the original one. It's not that much work to make it fit. Enlargen the screw holes and inner contours with needle file/flat file/sandpaper. Never mind the enlarged rhythm circuit hole. You'll be glad you did.
Of course you could use the MIJ neck or get a Musikraft/Warmoth/CGUSA one taylored to taste, but I feel the body deserves a vintage one in the end. Some day a beater neck might pop up that could be saved with a bit of TLC. Maybe I'm a bit militant regarding necks, but I'd take a new guitar with an old neck over the opposite any day.
Sorry for the instructional undertones...just waking up over here.
I had hoped to use the pg, but it had actually shrunk to the point where it wasn't covering the upper cavity when I got it. It's also very "milky" overall. I just figured rather than hacking it up to get something close to fitting I'd set it aside for now.
- fuzzking
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:06 am
- Contact:
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
I see. You know, I have a '63 and a '64 JM and on both, the upper cavity is showing through for a mm or two. Doesn't bother me. It's the guards that belong on these guitars IMHO. Then again, to each his own... but I think that repro guard doesn't do the guitar any justice. Or maybe just sell the vintage guard at ridiculous price and get a nice Spitfire one that compliments the ocean turquoise? A bit on the lighter side, yellowish? Like this?lwatford wrote:fuzzking wrote:Refin looking good!
(...)
I had hoped to use the pg, but it had actually shrunk to the point where it wasn't covering the upper cavity when I got it. It's also very "milky" overall. I just figured rather than hacking it up to get something close to fitting I'd set it aside for now.
Nobody exists on purpose.
- Pacafeliz
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 18518
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:34 pm
- Location: Cococologne, Germany
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
same here.
but PLEASE don't sodomize this old lady with that terrible Jimmy guard!
but PLEASE don't sodomize this old lady with that terrible Jimmy guard!
i love delay SO much ...that i procrastinate all the time.
- spacecadet
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 4351
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:03 am
- Location: Long Island, NY
- Contact:
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
I agree with the others - refin is looking good but it just needs better tort.
You could sell that vintage guard if you're not going to use it and *more* than pay for a Spitfire guard. People will still pay obscene prices even if you tell them the guard has shrunk to the point that the upper cavity shows a bit.
You could sell that vintage guard if you're not going to use it and *more* than pay for a Spitfire guard. People will still pay obscene prices even if you tell them the guard has shrunk to the point that the upper cavity shows a bit.
- Ursa Minor
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 5892
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 8:26 am
- Location: Chicago
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
BIG +1 for making the guard fit. It's so worth it, imo.
The artist formerly known as kosmonautmayhem.
- lwatford
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:32 pm
- Location: Helena, AL
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
you guys don't make it easy to spend less money...do you? I couldn't decide if I wanted to go all the way on a Spitfire guard or not. This is one of the Portlandmusic ones, I agree it does look more Japanese export than '60s Jazzmaster.
- zhivago
- Mods
- Posts: 21926
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:18 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
I am with the other guys...but offer a slightly "extended" view...put the guitar back together, play it, and then focus on the guard when the time is right
I have to agree with Michael too, that this one deserves a vintage neck, should funds allow, of course...the feel of a worn Fender neck is something to behold, and cherish
Take your time (if you have the time), and it is so special to own a vintage guitar
Great guitar!
I have to agree with Michael too, that this one deserves a vintage neck, should funds allow, of course...the feel of a worn Fender neck is something to behold, and cherish
Take your time (if you have the time), and it is so special to own a vintage guitar
Great guitar!
Resident Spartan.
- will
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
A more budget way to get a vintage neck for this might be to go with one from a Coronado - I have one on my guitar, and I'm super-happy with it. Plus, if you sell the Japanese neck and the leftover Coronado parts, you might wind up ahead in the end.
…though the downside is the different headstock shape, and that maybe you'll be haunted by the ghost of Roger Rossmeisl for disassembling an old Coronado.
…though the downside is the different headstock shape, and that maybe you'll be haunted by the ghost of Roger Rossmeisl for disassembling an old Coronado.
- lwatford
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:32 pm
- Location: Helena, AL
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
Any thoughts on this neck?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1963-Vintage-Fe ... 58cb27fa32" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I've seen it listed several times, it's got some things that make me a little leery of it. And it seems high.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1963-Vintage-Fe ... 58cb27fa32" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I've seen it listed several times, it's got some things that make me a little leery of it. And it seems high.
- lwatford
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:32 pm
- Location: Helena, AL
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
That's an interesting thought...I've seen more Coronado necks than jm necks.will wrote:A more budget way to get a vintage neck for this might be to go with one from a Coronado - I have one on my guitar, and I'm super-happy with it. Plus, if you sell the Japanese neck and the leftover Coronado parts, you might wind up ahead in the end.
…though the downside is the different headstock shape, and that maybe you'll be haunted by the ghost of Roger Rossmeisl for disassembling an old Coronado.
- will
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
The description could be more honest. It doesn't mention the crack coming out of the tuners, and the fret wear looks more than minor.
- fuzzking
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:06 am
- Contact:
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
Hmm the crack... at least they made a clear picture of it. The pictures look a bit stark in contrast, so I attribute the what looks like über-extreme discoloration on the back and orangey neck to the camera settings. Looks legit to me, but I'm not an expert. They could have included a pic of the neck stamp. If it's any like the 63 I have, it should feel fantastic. Well rounded C on mine.
(edit)
Coronado neck here
Who knows... a bit of headstock reshaping & refin, some clay dots and a new decal... whatever, it's half the price of the JM one you posted.
(edit)
Coronado neck here
Who knows... a bit of headstock reshaping & refin, some clay dots and a new decal... whatever, it's half the price of the JM one you posted.
Nobody exists on purpose.
- lwatford
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:32 pm
- Location: Helena, AL
Re: 62 Jazzmaster - well, sort of
Frets look shot, the crack really concerns me. Maybe I'll call and ask about it.will wrote:The description could be more honest. It doesn't mention the crack coming out of the tuners, and the fret wear looks more than minor.