Klusons vs. F-Tuners on pearl dot/bound neck offsets

Bringing your older offset back to life.
Post Reply

Do you have Klusons or F Tuners on your 1965/1966 dots & binding Jag/Jazz?

Klusons
4
67%
F Tuners
2
33%
 
Total votes: 6

User avatar
flatfiver
Expat
Expat
Posts: 1367
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:59 pm
Location: WI

Klusons vs. F-Tuners on pearl dot/bound neck offsets

Post by flatfiver » Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:55 pm

Assuming you have original equipment (or you know what was originally on your guitar), I'm curious to see the ratio between the two.  Post neck date info too if you have it.

Thanks! 
Zen & the Art of Jazzmaster Maintenance

User avatar
Jazzprod
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1817
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:03 am
Location: Hammarö, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Klusons vs. F-Tuners on pearl dot/bound neck offsets

Post by Jazzprod » Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:19 am

I've got double liners on my late '65 Jag  8)
......below the apes above the angels.....

User avatar
jetset
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1528
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 6:45 pm
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: Klusons vs. F-Tuners on pearl dot/bound neck offsets

Post by jetset » Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:43 am

I think it was also during the bound/dot era that the peghead shape went to the larger syle.  The Oct '65 Bound/dot LPB that I had had both klusons and the smaller original peghead shape.

-J
I can't hear the forest for all the falling trees.

User avatar
sookwinder
Mods
Mods
Posts: 11179
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:47 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Klusons vs. F-Tuners on pearl dot/bound neck offsets

Post by sookwinder » Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:55 am

my dot/binding 66 jag has F tuners
relaxing alternative to doing actual work ...

Post Reply