Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Bringing your older offset back to life.
Post Reply
User avatar
James
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:41 pm

Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by James » Thu Sep 25, 2008 1:43 pm

I  bought a parts Mustang from ebay and now I've had it a month or so to get used to it, I've decide to restore it to be somewhat vintage correct. I'm not bothered about things like the correct colour wires or anything that isn't visable when the guitar is assembled, but I would like to change the tuners for better ones (if not the ones that would have originally been on the neck).

This is what I know about the parts...

Dec '63 22.5" Musicmaster neck
64/65/66 Body
64/64 Pickguard and switches
70s Fender pickups (I have some numbers for these, I need to look into what they actually mean to get accurate dates)
'73 Comp Stang Bridge cover
'67 or early Pat Pending bridge
RI Kluson Deluxe tuners (most likely going)
New CTS pots (tone is a TBX) and non Fender knobs

Here are the original ebay pictures and the condition I got it in. Notice the strings don't go inside the Klusons, or wrap around the tailpiece of the bridge (that and a light string guage caused the problem with the trem arm you can see in the one pic).

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

At the moment i'm consider getting some US style knobs (with the rounded points) and using some alpha pots (not a big fan of the CTS), replacing the tuners and possibly a refin.

Anyway, before I get too into potential mods, here are some more detailed pics. When I got it I took it to bits, cleaned everything and put on some strat covers until I got some robroes for it. I took the switches apart and cleaned them (filthy contacts and they barely worked as they were supposed to) so in terms of general maintenance it's a smal truss rod adjustment away from a great setup.

On to the pics.... (pasting this bit from a shortscale post so the text might not be completely relevant)


Image

Image
3/4 is the model number, so they had a generic number for musicmasters and duos. Dec 63 the date and A the width (1 1/2")

Image
I love this Fender logo.

Image
It has the litle wood dowel from some tooling process or something

Image
Headstock again with strings

Image
The wood grain is awesome. You can just feel it if you feel the fretboard directly (rather than press the string into it) and it looks great up close. Check out the mojo clay dots.

Image
Close up of the pickguard showing how soft and old it looks. It's covered in small scratches like you can see there.

Image
The whole pickguard. It looks quite similar to what I remember hurb/stewart's duo looking like. I'll check a pic later to compare. Not the best picture but it looks good on the guitar, you can see it better in the last couple of pics.

Image
Bridge up close. Check the Pat. Pend. which means it's 67 or earlier. The bridge saddles look so clean because I polished them a little and then put the 'unused' side face up.

Image
Springs on the back of the trem plate.

Image
Shielding plate in the control cavity.

Image
Shielding plate in the pickup cavities. Notice the black foam that goes underneath the switches.

Image
Bridge back on.

Image
Front body shot. I should have probably taken some with the bridge cover off. Check the pickguard shrinkage.

Image
A final body shot.

And then a quick couple after I switched to robroe covers

Image

Image
It looks fairly similar, less of the light patches and more of the dark but the actual red colour is pretty close.


Image
The inside of the bridge cover is pitted quite badly, one side of the top has some slight pitting but overall the metal hardware is in great condition.

Image

Image
I tried to capture some of the finish imperfections. On a white body it's hard to photograph but easy to see. I might refinish it at some point. I'll almost definitely be keeping the tort pickguard, so daphne blue is the obvious choice.

Apologies for the epic picture post so far, but I want to lay all my cards on the table as to what I have to work with here.

These ae things I'm considering trying to do...
Age the pickup covers and switch tip (not sure if the trem arm is vintage or RI)
Age and slightly relic the finish or just refin
Replace Tuners
Change pots and knobs (not going vintage style on this, just functional, I'l go for the rounded knobs though)

I know you guys love the restoration projects so I'm sure there are a few ideas kicking through your heads as you read this that I haven't even considered, and I'd be more than happy to hear them.
[url=http://fendercolorchart.webatu.com/index.php][b]Fender Color Chart[/b][/url]

User avatar
Paolo_ray
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:56 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by Paolo_ray » Thu Sep 25, 2008 1:59 pm

Was this the one going on the uk ebay?  I nearly put a bid on this but ditched out at the last minute.  I was gutted when I saw it went  for about £190 ...

User avatar
James
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:41 pm

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by James » Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:06 pm

Aye, that's the one. I got the robroe covers for free so I've spent about £210 (including the train ticket to go and get it) on it so far. I imagine the neck is worth most of, if not all of that.
[url=http://fendercolorchart.webatu.com/index.php][b]Fender Color Chart[/b][/url]

User avatar
theworkoffire
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 4143
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 12:59 am
Location: Punching the future in the face, London
Contact:

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by theworkoffire » Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:40 pm

What an absolute steal! I love it. Will you try to swap the neck for a 24"?

User avatar
James
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:41 pm

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by James » Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:42 pm

I considered it but the current neck is comfy and it doesn't feel cramped to play. Maybe one day I will, perhaps if the offer falls in front of me and I can try the other neck out first I'll do it soon. At the moment I don't see a reason to as I like how it plays.
[url=http://fendercolorchart.webatu.com/index.php][b]Fender Color Chart[/b][/url]

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10036
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by luau » Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:43 pm

I'd swap that neck for a 24" B width Mustang neck with proper tuners, refin in Oly, and done.

If the leads are original on those pups, I think they are both for the neck position. Not that it matters much, but the bridge would have blue and yellow leads. I think that continued for the life of the Mustangs but I'm not 100%. The 5 and 6 digit pickup stamps have the 2nd to last 2 digits as the week and the last 2 digits as the year. Looks like 24th week of '79 for the one I can see. Code breakdown.

Cool guitar in any event. These are one of the few models that I actually like in white.
Bigger in sum than parts.

User avatar
James
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:41 pm

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by James » Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:48 pm

If I switched the neck for a 24" i'd only consider an A width. I've played quite a few mid 60s 24 necks and I like A width better. In fact the width of the nut is the one question I asked the seller before buying it.
[url=http://fendercolorchart.webatu.com/index.php][b]Fender Color Chart[/b][/url]

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10036
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by luau » Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:57 pm

Sounds like you're happy with the neck. More power to ya. :)
Bigger in sum than parts.

User avatar
James
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:41 pm

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by James » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:25 pm

Cheers for the link, here are the pics that show the codes

Bridge
16 24 79
Image

Neck
xx 15 73 (possibly 78)
Image

So they're both neck pickups? They both sound good but the neck pickup sounds better than the bridge. I like the dynamics and general response of both, but the bridge could use more bass. I wouldn't be against selling one or both of these and buying different ones. I'd certainly stick with vintage style single coils and might get a 60s mustang set at some point.
[url=http://fendercolorchart.webatu.com/index.php][b]Fender Color Chart[/b][/url]

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10036
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by luau » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:51 pm

Sure thing. That page is heaven.
James wrote:So they're both neck pickups? They both sound good but the neck pickup sounds better than the bridge. I like the dynamics and general response of both, but the bridge could use more bass. I wouldn't be against selling one or both of these and buying different ones. I'd certainly stick with vintage style single coils and might get a 60s mustang set at some point.
Yep. 24th week of '79 and 15th week of '73. Those first two batch code digits are sort of useless.

I'm confident that the 2nd one is a '73. If the leads are original, and they look to be, it's a neck pickup. I'm less familiar with the later 'stangs so I'm not 100% sure that the black/white = neck, blue/yellow = bridge rule applies in 1979. It may, I just don't know it for a fact. Anyone have a gut shot of a later one in original condition?

I'm not aware of any difference between neck/bridge pickups other than the leads and the bridge generally being a bit hotter. If I were going to replace those, I'd look into some Novaks or similar. The original pickups are interesting and fun, but I'd bet Mr. Novak could whip up something that would absolutely kill the originals from any era. I've got a couple with stock pups and I love them, so I'm not hating. They're a tad under-powered though, by design.
Bigger in sum than parts.

User avatar
crazypaws
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 958
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:56 am
Location: virginia beach, VA

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by crazypaws » Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:41 pm

fix the tremolo unit!!!
when an ambulance passes, it's just a gaint synthesizer - when the ambulance isn't synthesizing, the persons dead

User avatar
James
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:41 pm

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by James » Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:10 am

Stringing it up properly and using 13s have solved the trem problems, it works fine now.
[url=http://fendercolorchart.webatu.com/index.php][b]Fender Color Chart[/b][/url]

User avatar
rickenmetal
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 2:49 am

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by rickenmetal » Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:44 am

I am pretty sure the early Mustangs had a different headstock, like this:
Image

http://www.jag-stang.com/MrMaxima/

User avatar
James
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:41 pm

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by James » Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:29 am

I'm assuming that sort of white button Kluson would be the 'correct' type of tuner?

I'm fine with having a Musicmaster decal and a pre-Mustang neck
[url=http://fendercolorchart.webatu.com/index.php][b]Fender Color Chart[/b][/url]

User avatar
jop
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 6576
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:57 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: Vintage parts Mustang - need some restoration suggestions

Post by jop » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:29 am

That's some fine looking tort.  :?

Post Reply