62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Discussion of vintage Jazzmasters, Jaguars, Bass VIs, Electric XIIs and any other offset-waist instruments.
User avatar
rank
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1543
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:35 am

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by rank » Fri Apr 14, 2017 2:05 pm

Black with Oly white headstock. Thought I'd be different...
We are merely moving shadows.

blackbox
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:14 pm

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by blackbox » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:06 am

deleted image b/c huge. see later post for pic

I didn't have the exact neck date when I purchased (I trusted the seller). Turns out it's an early March "A" neck. Very thin, and I have fairly large hands, but I don't mind so much. With the small size, my son (in the background) can learn to play on it, making this the most expensive student guitar ever.
Last edited by blackbox on Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mcjt
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 4295
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Côte-St-Luc QC

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by mcjt » Wed Apr 19, 2017 9:35 am

uh yeah. it would be a great way to devalue the guitar too.
blackbox wrote:I'm going to do black without a matching headstock. I can't bring myself to destroy an original logo put on in the Fender plant.

User avatar
Soiouz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3399
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:31 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by Soiouz » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:17 am

Very early Jaguar you have there, with a slab board.

I'll add my voice to the crowds that say refin the body however you want, but leave that neck alone. Good decision you made there!


Plus, as another poster mentionned earlier, very early Jaguars in custom colour were produced without matching headstocks. Mid-late 1962, they started painting them to match. At least that is what Jim Shine says, and I reckon he knows these things quite a bit:

"A January 1962 pre-production. This totally stock guitar features the rare early non-matching headstock."

Here: http://www.jimshine.com/jaguar/fenderjaguarhistory.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
allthatmuch
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by allthatmuch » Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:47 am

If you can't get a pic of the neck stamp, always ask for the width of the nut...

On the other hand, your son's lucky!

blackbox
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:14 pm

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by blackbox » Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:00 pm

Probably should have, but an "A" slab board from March? That's someone's holy grail Jaguar neck (even if it's not mine). It's cool to have a super rare Jag neck like this, at any rate.

User avatar
FrankRay
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1543
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:54 am
Location: east london

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by FrankRay » Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:31 pm

Theoretically, march 62 necks aren't stamped. They only brought it in in april. Which makes yours a bit of an anomaly.

blackbox
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:14 pm

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by blackbox » Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:51 pm

I actually read that March is the first month they started doing it.

User avatar
mcjt
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 4295
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Côte-St-Luc QC

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by mcjt » Thu Apr 20, 2017 1:51 pm

Whose theory are you quoting?
FrankRay wrote:Theoretically, march 62 necks aren't stamped. They only brought it in in april. Which makes yours a bit of an anomaly.
Image

User avatar
PorkyPrimeCut
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 24472
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig
Contact:

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by PorkyPrimeCut » Thu Apr 20, 2017 1:57 pm

That photo looks weird. Is that stamp for real? It kinda looks Photoshopped.
You think you can't, you wish you could, I know you can, I wish you would. Slip inside this house as you pass by.

blackbox
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:14 pm

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by blackbox » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:04 pm

There's a lot of conflicting information out there. The stamp on my neck is pretty obviously real, though, which seems to prove that it was done. I think all FrankRay is saying is that it's uncommon for March necks to have stamps.

blackbox
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:14 pm

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by blackbox » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:07 pm

Maybe a slightly easier to read pic:

Image

blackbox
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:14 pm

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by blackbox » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:10 pm

This reference book says March '62 was the first month Fender used the stamp:

https://books.google.com/books?id=rTFER ... mp&f=false" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
FrankRay
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1543
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:54 am
Location: east london

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by FrankRay » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:29 pm

I just remember my mate has a march jag dated in pencil, whereas my april one was stamped; this chimes with Jim Shine's info on his site. I guess the stamps came in half way through march?

blackbox
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:14 pm

Re: 62 Jaguar refinish - moral quandries

Post by blackbox » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:34 pm

Yeah, I bet it was still half-and-half in March.

I will say that this guitar sounds extremely good. Warm but punchy, and still very much a Jaguar. I never would have guessed that I'd like an "A" neck, because I've never liked them on other Fenders, but there's something comfortable about this one.

Post Reply