MBV new record

Favorite new record? Favorite old record? Got a band? Post it here.
User avatar
aen
Expat
Expat
Posts: 3152
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:48 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

MBV new record

Post by aen » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:10 pm

I prefer their older stuff.

User avatar
StevenO
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 17770
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:06 pm

Re: MBV new record

Post by StevenO » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:24 pm

eh...

User avatar
PorkyPrimeCut
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 24472
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by PorkyPrimeCut » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:31 pm

Discuss?? I can't type properly cos of my giddiness!!!

I saw the guy (Kevin Shields) in a lift in Hampstead tube & this issue was one question I never asked him!! Yeah..OK, I didn't even speak to the guy in the end. Another missed opportunity!!

My Bloody Valentine were a band I had the opportunity to see twice & never did. Reading '89 & Leeds. There are a lot of bands of this era reforming to cash in once more but none actually creating anything new. After hearing his background playing with Patty Smith recently I reckon the guys got a lot to give. Whether he can actually get there in the studio is another issue.

D'you know Alan McGee booted them of Creation cos they ran up 10's of thousands of pounds trying to get their sound right!! Kevin Shields is a pioneer. Back then he didn't have the resources but hopefully nowadays he's got a studio he can afford (hell, he's probably got his own studio!!)

One more thought, Bilinda Butcher in her mature 40's. Call me a dirty old/young man but....ding dong!!!  :)

P.S - When they tour & I miss out on tickets (which is a bad habit of mine at the moment) you'll be seeing me on the news, burning down every venue they play at out of sheer bitterness!!!

THEY made me realize!!!!!
Last edited by Anonymous on Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You think you can't, you wish you could, I know you can, I wish you would. Slip inside this house as you pass by.

User avatar
dc
Expat
Expat
Posts: 2319
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:57 pm
Location: seattle

Re: MBV new record

Post by dc » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:53 pm

let me guess -- it's going to be called "Chinese Democracy"
in the coldest night / huddled 'round the dying embers

User avatar
JazzBlaster
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 9474
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 1:34 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by JazzBlaster » Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:24 pm

yes, Kevin says this in every interview. I have lost hope long ago  :?
It's not about the gear! It's about you, your hands, your imagination, your feelings.

User avatar
chrisjedijane
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3322
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by chrisjedijane » Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:47 pm

just to clear anything up, here's the full article:

My Bloody Valentine
Kevin Shields Sets The "Loveless" Record Straight

Loveless isn't simply My Bloody Valentine's shoegazing masterpiece; the 1991
album is also the basis for one for alt-rock's greatest yarns. It's been
reported that MBV leader Kevin Shields spent three years and a half-million
dollars painstakingly piecing together Loveless in the studio, bankrupting the
band's label, Creation Records, in the process. On the 15th anniversary of the
LP's release, Shields tells MAGNET that things aren't always as they seem.

The two things we're really known for spending Creation's money and making
records with loads of overdubs on them. The exact truth is this: About a month
before we started Loveless, Creation pulled away from Rough Trade distribution
and said, " Out contract is up with you. We don't want to sign again." By the
time we resumed recording in September of '89, Creation was already bankrupt.
When we first started Loveless, no one signed to Creation. When we finished
the damn record, they had hit records and bands on Top of The Pops. They were
a very successful label. All that stuff about us nearly breaking Creation
because we spent all their money is literally 100 percent lies.

Another interesting fact is that we were only in the studio a year and 10
months. We spent six month out of the studio touring behind (1990's) Glider
EP, so really, we were only in the studio a year and four months. The last two
months, it was £600 a day. Every studio before that was between £200 and £250.
If you actually do the math, you realize that those figures don't add up (to
the record's reported £250,000 price tag). About a year after Loveless,
Creation got in trouble, right before Oasis, because Primal Scream spent £1
million on Give Up But Don't Give Out.

Creation's financial situation had nothing to do with us, except we made them
much richer by getting tons of bands to sign to them that wouldn't have
otherwise. We signed to Creation because of the Jesus and Mary Chain. I do
sound like I'm being pretty negative about the whole Creation thing, but it's
more that I just get bored when people ask me. I'm just going to tell the
truth now. I always used to gloss over it, but I'm bored of glossing over the
truth.

Basically, Creation was out of their minds on drugs. No one was prepared to
front us the money to get our act together or give us the money to get
equipment. Between having nowhere to live and having no real equipment, we
were actually getting somewhere with an audience. When we made Loveless, no
money had arrived. We thought we had proven ourselves; at that point, it was
the whole music scene that came after us. People were into the whole
juxtaposition of the kind of gentleness with the extreme violence side of the
music.

Creation found Alan McGee is kind of an unusual character. Our relationship
with Creation was mostly through label manger Dick Green. McGee was really
excited by us, but he was never around. We'd see him once a month or once
every few weeks, but he didn't understand when we'd do the slow songs. When we
were recording, he told me that it should be more like (1988 EP) You Made Me
Realise. He spent all that year trying to get us to release another song of
Isn't Anything called "(When You Wake) You're Still In A Dream" as the next
single. We were like, "No, we're finished with that now. We're moving on to a
new thing."

Basically, when he'd come to these sessions in January and April of '89, I
just said, "I don't want you to come to the studio anymore." He didn't like
that very much, but before we even started Loveless, there was a problem. I
know he was only trying to be helpful, but he was jumping around saying, "This
has to be the best record ever made!" He was looking for a group to be the
next Primal Scream or the Sex Pistols. We were his biggest bet. Instead of us
including him and bringing him in, we just sort of pushed him away. They
thought it was strange that I wouldn't let them in the studio .. like I was
being overly artistic .. but it was more because a studio for us was like
home. We were all homeless until after Loveless got made.

The way I saw it .. because I was the producer and kind of in charge of
everything .. I was a bit of a tyrant. I would just really be strict. It got
to the point where I lived with these songs for more than a year, and the
melodies were only in my head.

I've always told people exactly how I've made a record. The average My Bloody
Valentine track is about one or two guitar tracks: less than a White Stripes
or Cramps record. I could only get away with having one or two guitars at any
one point because if you put a few on, then it took away from the effect, it
sounded smaller and smaller. Basically, a My Bloody Valentine record has the
same amount of tracks on it as most bands' demos do.

When making records, I got it into my head that some of the big no-no's were
no echo, no reverb, no chorus or flanger and no panning. The one effect I
would use was this reversed reverb effect, which is very reverb-y, all of
these things I was against, right? But the irony was that with these effects,
you could actually play harder and it sounded really different. If you played
softer, the sound changed dramatically. I would work with a tremolo to get
this other dynamic and suddenly had a language I could kind of express myself
with, which I never really had before. I found a voice, and I could do it
well.

After a while, I was playing in such a way that people thought it was some
weird effect or studio manipulation. People in the press couldn't get their
heads around it. We were going for a sound that drew you in. When people make
records, they add; they try to clarify everything with cue and compression and
stuff. Everything has its own space and doesn't sound like it's happening in
the same place. We weren't trying to make anything stick out too much.
Everything was quite full on. The vocals, especially. We were kind of amused
that people would think we were singing softly, but in fact we were singing in
a very controlled way. Then we'd get compared to a lot of other shoegazing
bands; they were doing everything we hated, using loads of chorus, flanger and
all these effects on their guitars and singing genuinely softly and it was all
whispery. It was so hard to get away from that. We were singing as loud as we
could to sing the way we wanted to. (Singer/guitarist) Bilinda Butcher's voice
in particular had a really breathy quality to it, but she sounds like that
when she sings pretty loudly, too. Neither of us could sing in a shouty sort
of way.

Anyway, people forget now that "alternative" is just another way to make a
million pounds. Back in those days, it was really hard to get a publishing
deal if you weren't on a major label. We only got our publishing deal around
Christmas of 1990 because we had done our licensing deal with Warner Bros. We
never got paid a penny for any records we sold in America. We've never been
accounted to by Warner Bros. Alan McGee and Dick Green were only 27 or 28 and
weren't experienced. They were guys who had never in their life managed a
band's career. They'd only had bands who'd done well, like the Jesus and Mary
Chain or the House Of Love, who'd leave the label the minute they were playing
to 1,000 people.

The really sick part of the whole story is that we'd been offered two
different major-label contracts. Seymour Stein wanted to sign us to Sire, but
we didn't want to sign a major record contract. We wanted to be in charge of
everything. We signed to creation for £15,000 even though we're being offered
£150,000. I would never accuse Creation of ripping us off. It was all down to
the human inexperience, drug taking and lack of awareness and petty mistakes.
I resent Alan McGee's lies, but he can't help it. He lies about everything.
That's just his style. If people choose to believe that, that's their
business.

A lot of people say the reason My Bloody Valentine didn't make another record
is because we couldn't. That's mostly true, but not because we couldn't make
another record, but because I never could be bothered to make another record
unless I was really excited by it. And just by fate or whatever, that never
happened. I'm quite optimistic about the future, even though experience has
taught me that I'm probably just delusional. I do feel that I will make
another great record. We are 100 percent going to make another My Bloody
Valentine record unless we die or something. I'd feel really bad if I didn't
make another record. Like, "Shit, people only go the first two chapters, but
the last bit is the best bit." It's just that it's taken me such an oddly long
time for that to happen. How long will that take to transpire into an actual
physical record? I don't know.

--Interview by MacKenzie Wilson
__________________


hope that clears it up a little - it's always clear as mud with Kevin Shields
"we lack the motion to move to the new beat"

User avatar
PorkyPrimeCut
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 24472
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by PorkyPrimeCut » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:59 pm

OK. Alan McGee is a twat!! Its official. Back then everyone (well, all my mates) were convinced that they got booted off cos of their over-expensive experimentations. Sounds like that was a load of press bullshit now.

Amazing too that they used hardly any FX when it sounds laden with them. Sorry Slowdive, Swervedriver, even Ride. You suck in comparison!!!
You think you can't, you wish you could, I know you can, I wish you would. Slip inside this house as you pass by.

User avatar
Ursoluno
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 388
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:09 am
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by Ursoluno » Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:20 pm

jazzheadmark wrote: Amazing too that they used hardly any FX when it sounds laden with them. Sorry Slowdive, Swervedriver, even Ride. You suck in comparison!!!
I'm glad you had the guts to say it first.  I agree wholeheartedly.

No other shoegaze bands were in the same ballpark as My Bloody Valentine at their peak.  Nice enough bands on their own, sure.  But compared to Kevin Shields and company, they were miles away from approaching the stuff that was on "Loveless."

How often can you easily select ONE album that defines an entire genre of music?  MBV's "Loveless" and Earth's "Earth 2" are pretty much the only two that I can think of.
...purple attics, purple helixes, vacuum cleaners, and cement.

User avatar
JazzBlaster
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 9474
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 1:34 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by JazzBlaster » Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:26 pm

who could blame him for not wanting to try and top that ablum? where wouold you go from there?
It's not about the gear! It's about you, your hands, your imagination, your feelings.

idiotbear

Re: MBV new record

Post by idiotbear » Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:27 pm

jazzheadmark wrote: OK. Alan McGee is a twat!!
We all knew that.

User avatar
scottme
Expat
Expat
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:57 pm
Location: Newcastle
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by scottme » Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:29 pm

I think it's reasonably certain that a big part of the load of cash that Primal Scream spent went up arms / nose / in smoke. There were tales of Primal Scream and Swervey lads hanging out at the Creation offices.

I would imagine that maybe only Colm and maybe Belinda would be involved in any new material. I would be curious as to a totally different juxtaposition of Kevin's sound compared to current music. I hope it happens though!

User avatar
Tweez
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Hull, UK

Re: MBV new record

Post by Tweez » Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:35 pm

We got into a discussion about this over at the MBV forums, my opinion is LIES, not that I wouldn't love to see it but then again it would have to be something in quite a different direction because in my eyes remaking another Shoegaze in the vein of Loveless would be futile, Loveless can't be topped.

User avatar
PorkyPrimeCut
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 24472
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by PorkyPrimeCut » Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:35 pm

Hand on heart my favourite MBV tunes come from the 3 EP's they did & maybe Isn't Anything. Loveless WAS astoundingly-originally-sonic but those 3 EP's captured a moment for me.

You Made Me Realize & Feed Me With Your Kiss were as close to a "Smells Like Teen Spirit" moment as you can get, personally!!

After reading the Pitchfork interview posted by chrisjedijane (thanks!!) it just re-enforces my opinion that, once Kevin Shields got on board, they were gonna be (and were) something very, very special!!
You think you can't, you wish you could, I know you can, I wish you would. Slip inside this house as you pass by.

User avatar
PorkyPrimeCut
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 24472
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig
Contact:

Re: MBV new record

Post by PorkyPrimeCut » Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:05 pm

Tweez wrote: We got into a discussion about this over at the MBV forums, my opinion is LIES, not that I wouldn't love to see it but then again it would have to be something in quite a different direction because in my eyes remaking another Shoegaze in the vein of Loveless would be futile, Loveless can't be topped.
Shoegazing was just another stupid pigeon-holing title anyway!! The music press put it down to them "being a bit depressed" rather than them using a lot of pedals!!!

Seriously. I'm convinced Kevin Shields could come up with some amazing stuff (judging from his backing track with Patty Smith). Nothing amazingly ground-breaking but definitely original (as in he invented it!!). Whether anything gets released is another issue entirely!!
You think you can't, you wish you could, I know you can, I wish you would. Slip inside this house as you pass by.

User avatar
Tweez
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Hull, UK

Re: MBV new record

Post by Tweez » Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:44 pm

jazzheadmark wrote: Hand on heart my favourite MBV tunes come from the 3 EP's they did & maybe Isn't Anything. Loveless WAS astoundingly-originally-sonic but those 3 EP's captured a moment for me.

You Made Me Realize & Feed Me With Your Kiss were as close to a "Smells Like Teen Spirit" moment as you can get, personally!!

After reading the Pitchfork interview posted by chrisjedijane (thanks!!) it just re-enforces my opinion that, once Kevin Shields got on board, they were gonna be (and were) something very, very special!!
They did more than 3 EP's, 10 to be exact, but I agree I prefer Glider to anything else they did. And Kevin was onboard from the beginning it was Bilinda who joined after Sunny Sundae Smile. People complain about these pidgeonholes like Shoegaze, but they need to exist to an extent, you couldn't describe Loveless as merely 'rock music' it's way too generalised and vague although these classifications can get out of hand at times and bands to cross borders.

Post Reply