Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Make it loud here.
User avatar
Kadenray
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:02 am

Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by Kadenray » Sat May 07, 2016 8:38 am

Which one sounds better? which one takes big muffs better?

User avatar
MechaBulletBill
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 8:16 am
Location: UK

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by MechaBulletBill » Sat May 07, 2016 9:24 am

I know J Mascis - a man of many Muffs - sometimes uses the 100w Twin Amp from the 90s. I don't know if they're much different in value from the Red Knob Twin.

User avatar
Kadenray
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:02 am

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by Kadenray » Sun May 08, 2016 10:41 am

1 reply?! I know there's opinions out there on these amps!

User avatar
shoule79
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1967
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:57 am
Location: London....the one in Canada

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by shoule79 » Sun May 08, 2016 12:15 pm

I had a red knob twin in the late 90's. It convinced me to start buying vintage Fender.

Not that it was a bad amp, perfectly serviceable, but not as nice as the vintage ones id started getting access to.

I've never been exposed to one of the reissues for any prolonged period of time. For tone id rate them above the red knob But not as good as the originals (by originals I include silver face). I'm going off some foggy memories, Your results may vary.

One thing I'd say about the red knob, it had a slightly different tone stack in the mid areas, and I recall liking it with my muff.

millarman9111993
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1646
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:43 am
Location: Essex, UK

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by millarman9111993 » Sun May 08, 2016 1:25 pm

shoule79 wrote:
One thing I'd say about the red knob, it had a slightly different tone stack in the mid areas, and I recall liking it with my muff.
Yeah the Rivera era fenders and the red knob ones definitely have a more pronounced mid range than what you would consider the '"typical fender sound" to have.
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

User avatar
andy_tchp
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8050
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:36 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by andy_tchp » Sun May 08, 2016 11:40 pm

^^^ which is a pretty good thing when it comes to pairing with a Big Muff, which is often completely useless in an ensemble mix.
"I don't know why we asked him to join the band 'cause the rest of us don't like country music all that much; we just like Graham Lee."
David McComb, 1987.

User avatar
al30
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 564
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:55 am

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by al30 » Mon May 09, 2016 7:35 am

I've seen a lot of red knob Fenders in the shop but almost none on a stage.

AL

User avatar
Kadenray
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:02 am

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by Kadenray » Mon May 09, 2016 8:22 am

Thanks so much for that tidbit of information. Now I'm very interested, considering finding a good amp for my big muff is my main concern.

millarman9111993
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1646
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:43 am
Location: Essex, UK

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by millarman9111993 » Mon May 09, 2016 12:09 pm

Kadenray wrote:Thanks so much for that tidbit of information. Now I'm very interested, considering finding a good amp for my big muff is my main concern.
get something that isn't a fender then, although as i mentioned the red knob amps tend to have more midrange there are much better amps out there for that purpose
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

User avatar
Kadenray
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:02 am

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by Kadenray » Thu May 19, 2016 1:46 pm

I'm open to just about anything. What do you suggest millarman?

User avatar
nucleardonut
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2015 6:07 pm

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by nucleardonut » Fri May 20, 2016 10:06 am

My advice would be to look for an old silver face Twin from the '70s -- the master volume ones can be affordable. Get it "blackfaced" by a good tech and you'll have a great amp with far more reliability and tone than either of those circuit-board amps. Silverface Twins are surprisingly cheap compared to other vintage Fenders, probably due to the fact that they're way too heavy and loud for most people's purposes.

User avatar
Mechanical Birds
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3624
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 1:24 pm

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by Mechanical Birds » Fri May 20, 2016 7:45 pm

I wonder how hard it'd be to voice a SF Twin like a Sunn model T? The Hovercraft stuff is always said to be minimally-messed with, so what would that require? A couple transistors here or there?

User avatar
sa1126
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 710
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:17 am

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by sa1126 » Sat May 21, 2016 9:12 am

Mechanical Birds wrote:I wonder how hard it'd be to voice a SF Twin like a Sunn model T? The Hovercraft stuff is always said to be minimally-messed with, so what would that require? A couple transistors here or there?
IDK if that would be possible. The hovercraft amps are all just rebadged jet city's, I don't think they have any of their own circuits.
Gibson Les Paul Custom --> Orange AD30

great deals with dug, grandmasterdavid, ChrisFFTA, Bryce_dude13, cestlamort, jimi, HNB,blake480,DocCarlson,
Gonkulator, AWSchmit, billboneys, panoramic,Gavanti,seancomm,Swansonron,Con-Tiki!

User avatar
MechaBulletBill
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 8:16 am
Location: UK

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by MechaBulletBill » Sat May 21, 2016 1:14 pm

Wasn't the model T based on a bassman?

User avatar
Mechanical Birds
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3624
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 1:24 pm

Re: Redknob the twin vs twin reverb 65 reissue.

Post by Mechanical Birds » Sat May 21, 2016 8:30 pm

sa1126 wrote:
Mechanical Birds wrote:I wonder how hard it'd be to voice a SF Twin like a Sunn model T? The Hovercraft stuff is always said to be minimally-messed with, so what would that require? A couple transistors here or there?
IDK if that would be possible. The hovercraft amps are all just rebadged jet city's, I don't think they have any of their own circuits.
That's why I brought it up - most of the amp is there, they just throw a few small parts in it to change the voicing and boom, you allegedly have a T. I have no idea what parts go into "voicing" an amp though so who knows.

Post Reply