Reverb Tank Ohm Confusion
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2024 3:56 pm
Am i reading this wrong?
So i inherited a Princeton Chorus amp that needs a new tank. Code is: 8EB2C1B.
Online i found this hella detailed website.
I scroll down to the code chart to find the correct impedances: type 8EB and 9EB need 800Ω in, 2.575kΩ out, cool. But then here they state, " As long as the last 6 digits are the same, type 4AB3C1B and type 9AB3C1B tanks are interchangeable, ". But the chart doesn't seem to read like that. There could be up to a 200-500Ω difference in impedances depending on the letter. Maybe that's nothing, but it doesn't seem to 'match'.
If that is in fact correct, could i use a 4EB3C1B in my amp? A longer tank would physically fit, and I'd prefer a more classic Fender 2 spring Twin Reverb sound. I know the reverb circuits are different, but with the 2 spring tanks the notes seems to sit a bit more in front of the reverb to my ear.
Anyone that can help clarify?
So i inherited a Princeton Chorus amp that needs a new tank. Code is: 8EB2C1B.
Online i found this hella detailed website.
I scroll down to the code chart to find the correct impedances: type 8EB and 9EB need 800Ω in, 2.575kΩ out, cool. But then here they state, " As long as the last 6 digits are the same, type 4AB3C1B and type 9AB3C1B tanks are interchangeable, ". But the chart doesn't seem to read like that. There could be up to a 200-500Ω difference in impedances depending on the letter. Maybe that's nothing, but it doesn't seem to 'match'.
If that is in fact correct, could i use a 4EB3C1B in my amp? A longer tank would physically fit, and I'd prefer a more classic Fender 2 spring Twin Reverb sound. I know the reverb circuits are different, but with the 2 spring tanks the notes seems to sit a bit more in front of the reverb to my ear.
Anyone that can help clarify?