U-Tracer 3+

Make it loud here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Racing
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:29 pm

U-Tracer 3+

Post by Racing » Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:54 pm

Say wut?

Well i guess most of you are familiar with that there´s thing known as tube testers. Most of these are old...and rarely calibrated and what not. Yes,i´ve got one of them too. A old East-German made RPG-70.
That RPG of mine i´ve overhauled from one end to the other and indeed...it hands me the most basic information.

Image

Many come down on these East-German builds as being ripoffs of the old West-German Funke builds but...nah. Off mark. No matter they do what they claim to do and done deal. Mine is a later build,being put together back in 1977. For a regular tube tester that´s "new".
Anyways.
What when we´re in need of more information and what´s more...what about making the whole concept hit the 21st century?
Well.
Enter U-Tracer.

http://www.dos4ever.com/uTracer3/uTracer3_pag0.html

That´s the URL for them.

Image

Image

The U-Tracer is delivered in kit form. A mere 215 Euros does it and...that makes for that some regard this as a toy. Having completed my own i can only attest to that it is CERTAINLY not.

Image

Image

Actual PCB is out of fibreglass and sturdy to the build. Through plated as far as the holes. In short a piece of well engineered PCB.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

...various components come neatly packaged and marked.

Altho this to a large extent comes down to "paint by numbers" i still want to go on record and state that a U-Tracer is NOT a kit for the novice. You need some basic understanding before taking on a build like this.

Image

To handle this...one SERIOUSLY well written build manual!

Image

As it indeed is a kit that means that you´ll have to look up various bits n pieces on your own. This little pine box i picked up locally. Added some hinges and a latch..you get the drill.

So. I took to trying to figure this project out. One of the major issues with tube testers/tracers is the sockets. Tubes have been produced with different sockets and pinouts out the fabled so..how to handle that?

Well.

Image

Image

Me i´m a lazy SOB. Most engineers are...that´s why we become.. :D So what i did was opt to order quite a few so called saver sockets for octals and novals directly from Asia. They´re cheap enough.
So. To NOT end up with a build that´s filled to the brim with various sockets i decided on going this route..and it´ll be simple enough to repin these saver sockets within to cater to whatever tube i wish to test really.
This entails even using old odd sockets...like for EL-12´s..EF-12s..and what not. ECL-82 and 86...ECC-808´s...you name it. The saver sockets will in short just do what i ask of them.

Image

One of the few limitations of the U-Tracer is that it´s limited to 1.5A for heater current. So. I opted to install a separate transformer for that,so i can switch between the internal and external (read-transformer) heaters.
The actual U-Tracer in turn is powered by a common laptop brick. As a brick like that is switched that brings that the capacity of it,in amperes,is rather large.

Image

That there in turn is what that external transformer will head into. A PWM (pulse width modulated) piece of kit that makes it possible to control output voltage between 2VDC and approx 35VDC.

Image

The actual build then..IS very much "paint by numbers". The designers of the kit have very wisely made it a point to halt every now and then to test that the various "blocks" of the build works as intended.

For some reason the designers recomend that you use a very sharp edged/thin tip for your soldering station. I for one found this NOT to be true. Working on tube stuff the tips i use are rather large...and i got by real easy with my regular "medium" tip and 1mm dia solder.

Image

Faceplate. A simple anodized piece of 2mm thick aluminium.

Image

I went at it..and all of a sudden i was done. Or..so i thought.

Image

...i had missed out on a pair of resistors (omitted them completely). An error that was remedied in no time tho so no harm no foul.

Image

Flipside of the faceplate and...OH will this side of it every get busy!

Image

Of course the mains switch needed a "Racing" touch! :D

Image

To keep control of the lid i opted to install a regular gas spring for kitchen doors.

Image

Pilot light. Of course.

Image

Then for a digital voltmeter and a trim pot for that PWM PCB,to be able to adjust output voltage.

Image

The miniswitch is to choose between heater voltage from the stand alone transformer or the onboard heater circuit of the U-Tracer.

Image

Wiring then. DAMN i hate laying heater wiring down!

Image

A 10A rectifier and an e-cap for the standalone unit.

Image

That pine box got some mahogony taint. Tried using clearcoat within but..that simply got to shiny for my taste. It´s a damn tool after all,so i opted to go with regular oil instead.

Image

Yes. Of course that mains breaker needed a "remove before flight" :w00t:

Image

Starting to give you an idea i guess.

Image

A´la the well known AVO testers loads of ferrites were added for the wiring.

Image

Sure enough. An old EL-84 being put through its paces...

User avatar
Fiddy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 12395
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Canada Dry

Re: U-Tracer 3+

Post by Fiddy » Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:32 pm

That looks great. That box is just perfect. :-*

User avatar
Racing
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:29 pm

Re: U-Tracer 3+

Post by Racing » Wed Feb 15, 2017 5:57 pm

Image

Hm. The RPG serves me well,don´t get me wrong,but i got literally craploads of tubes laying around that i for various reasons have saved. Not only odd or expensive ones but bread n butter ones like EL-34´s and 6L6´s too.
Reason is simple,every now and then a cust comes in the door with an amp where for instance one out of four tubes has gone belly up. Up until now it´s been kind of a chore figuring out what tube to offer...the RPG,as any older tube tester,isn´t exactly fast to use compared to the U-Tracer.

So. The U-Tracer is. That there in the pic is a small bin full of "no good" tubes. Testing them turned into a breeze.

In short? The U-Tracer is the good stuff. Happy as pie that i took the time to put one together.

User avatar
Racing
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:29 pm

Re: U-Tracer 3+

Post by Racing » Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:19 am

Image

An EL-84 being put through its paces in the pic. The various tests that can be performed about says it all. This one..i´m checking how the tube in case reacts to anode load vs g1 voltage.

Image

In turn so called quick tests can be run. This essentially provides you with raw data of the tube. In short it tells how "well" the tube in case is. Let it be known that having run hundreds of tubes through testers...it sure plants the mere FACT that tubes NEED to be run on a tester to tell status. It is that simple.

Image

Here a pair of EL-84´s with their anode draw and gm labeled to them.

Gm is in short transconductance. The layman way of explaining that is that gm is how the tube in case reacts to signal and voltages presented for g1. How we match the tubes and what not in short.

Bottom line?
Not all tubetesters or trace testers are created equal. This much is for sure. That said much info can be had from running a tube on ANY tester,meaning that it is better to test than not test at all.
Sans..you´re in conclusion flying blind.

Being well aware that other builders et al read these posts as well i can only attest to that pulling the trigger for a U-Tracer is a good call to make.
Drawbacks?
Yes. It IS IMO a drawback that a U-Tracer does not test for shorts before proceeding to evaluate the tube at hand. As there´s no way of telling what a used tube has been through..this needs to be taken into account. In short i for one at least firmly believe that a U-Tracer needs to be complimented by a regular "old school" one as basically ALL older testers will be able to.
The software for the U-Tracer bugs a bit. When changing screen from being a tracer to the quick test for instance...not all doing what it should at all times.

That said i still find the U-Tracer WELL worth the effort,labor involved and expense. It IS a formidable tool and thus..IMO should be found in the arsenal of all tube techs.
Learning to interpret the info given in turn is at least half easy if you´re into it and the info extracted IS valuable. No argument.

Post Reply